MODEL INTERAKSI STRUKTUR KEPEMILIKAN TERHADAP KEBIJAKAN HUTANG DAN DIVIDEN DALAM PERSPEKTIF TEORI KEAGENAN PADA PERUSAHAAN MANUFAKTUR GO PUBLIK DI INDONESIA

Suyatmini Suyatmini(1*), Triyono Triyono(2), Muhammad Wahyuddin(3)

(1) Dosen Program Studi Pendidikan Akuntansi FKIP UMS
(2) Fakultas Ekonomi UMS
(3) Fakultas Ekonomi UMS
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The aims of the research are: (1) to find out the structure of stock ownership at the public companies in Indonesia, (2) to analyze effects of stock ownership structure by insider ownership and institutional investor on debt policy and dividend policy at the public companies in Indonesia, (3) to obtain empirical evidences that control mechanism through stock ownership by the insider ownership and the institutional investor will decrease the problems of agency, which then minimizes the cost of agency,(4)to fain out simultaneous relation between the insider ownership, the institutional investor, the debt policy, and the dividend policy. The samples of the research which included 70 manufacturing companies registered at the Jakarta Stock Exchange. The samples were taken by using a purposive sampling technique. The hypotheses were then tested by means of a simultaneous analysis of Two Stage Least Square. The results of the research show that (1) the insider ownership has a significant effect on the debt policy and, there is a substitution or negative causal relation between the insider ownership and debt policy; (2) the institutional investor has a significant effect on the debt policy, and there is a substitution or negative causal relation between the institutional investor and the debt policy. (3)the institutional investor has a negative effect on
the insider ownership, (4)the dividend policy does not have a significant effect on the institutional investor, (5) there is a substitution relation between the debt policy and the dividend policy.

Keywords

cost of agency; debt policy; ownership structure; theory of agency

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amiruddin. (2003).Hubungan Keputusan Pendanaan, Peluang Pertumbuhan Dan Struktur Kepemilikan: Suatu Perspektif Keagenan, Majalah Ekonomi ,Th.VIII,No. 1

Bathala,C.T., K.R. Moon., dan R.P. Rao. (1994). “Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and The Impact of Institutional Holdings; and Agency Perspektive”, Financial Management

, 38-50.

Brigham,E. F. dan L. C. Gapenski. (1996). Intermediate Financial Management, Fifth Edition, New York: The Dryden press.

Brigham, E. F.dan L.C.Gapenski, Daves, PR. (1999). Intermediate Financial Management, Sixth Edition.New York: The Dryden Press.

Brigham E.F. dan Daves P. R.. (2004). Intermediate Financial Management, Eighth Edition, Southwestern.

Brigham, F. Eugene and Houston, F. Joel, 2006. Fundamentals of Financial Management. Edisi Kesepuluh Terjemahan Bahasa Indonesia, Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Chen, R.Carl, dan Steiner T. (1999). Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflict: A Non Linear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risk Taking, Debt Policy, and Dividend Policy”, Financial Review, vol. 34, 119-137.

Coffee, J.C., JR. (1991). “Liquidity Versus Control: The Institutional Investor as Corporate Monitor”. Columbia Law Review, October, 1277-1368.

Cooper.D.R. dan Schindler,P.S. (2003). Business Research Methods, Eighth Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.30

Crutchley, C.E., M.R.H. Jensen., J.S. Jahera. Jr., dan J.E. Raymond (1999).” Agency Problems and The Simultaneity Decision Making The Role of Institusional Ownership”, International Reviw of Financial Analysis, 8:2.

Easterbrook, F, 1984. “Two agency-cost explanations of dividends”. American Economic Review, Vol. 74, p. 650-659.

Fama, E.(1980). “Agency Problem and The Theory of The Firm”, Journal of Political Ecomomy 88, 288-325.

Fama, E., dan M. Jensen. (1983). “Separation of Ownership and Control”, Journal of Law and Ecomomic 26, 301-325.

Frank, Murray Z and Vindhan K. Goyal, 2004. “Capital Structrure Decisions Which Factor are Realibly Important”? www.google.co.id

Friend, I.dan L. Lang. (1988). “An Empirical Test of The Impact of Managerial Self-interest on Corporate Capital Structure”, Journal of Finance 43, 271-281.

Ghozali, I. (2006). Analisis Multivariate Lanjutan Dengan Program SPSS, Semarang: Badan Penerbit: Universitas Diponegoro.

Grossman, S. dan 0. Hart. (1982). Corporate Financial Structure and Managerial Incentives, in John McCall, ed., The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL).

Gujarati, D.N.(2003). Basic Econometrics. Fourth Edition New York:McGrow-Hill. International Editions.

Husnan, Suad, 2000. Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Penerapan (Keputusan Jangka Panjang). Edisi Keempat, Buku 1. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Heckert J. B., Willson J. D. dan Campbell J. B.(1996). Controllership Tugas Akuntan Manajemen, Edisi Ketiga, Jakarta : Erlangga.

Jensen, M. (1986). “Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers”, American Economic Review 76, 323-329.

Jensen, M. dan W. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure”, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360

Jensen, G., D. Solbeng., dan T. Zorn. (1992). “Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 247-263.

Kim, W and E. Sorensen, 1986. “Evidence on The Impact of The Agency Costs of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy”. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 21, p. 131-144.

Leland, H and D. Pyle, 1977, “Informational Asymetries, Financial Structure and Financial Intermediation”. Journal of Finance 32, p. 371-388.

Mahrt, J.dan Smith. (2005).The Interaction of Capital Structure and Ownership Structure.”http://proquest.umi.com.

Makmun, 2003. Analisa Pengaruh Insider Ownership, Dividen, Pertumbuhan dan Profitabilitas Perusahaan terhadap Kebijakan Hutang pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEJ. Tesis

Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Mehran, H. (1992). “Executive Incentive Plans, Corporate Control, and Capital Structure”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 539-560.

Myers, S and N. Majluf. 1984, “Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have information that Investors do not have “. Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, p. 187-221.

Moh’d, M.A., L.G.Perry., dan J.N. Rimbey. (1998). “ The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: A Time-Series Cross-Sectional Analysis”, Financial Review,

August,Vol.33, 85-99.

Nguyen, T. D. K., dan Ramachandran. N. (2006). “ Capital Structure in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises The Case of Vietnam”. http://proquest.umi.com.

Saunders, A., EStrock., and N.G. Travlos. (1990). “Ownership Structure, Deregulation and Bank Risk Taking”, Journal of Finance, 45, No.2.

Sartono, Agus, 2001. Manajemen Keuangan Teori dan Aplikasi. Edisi Keempat. Yogyakarta: FEUGM.

Shleifer, A., dan R. Vishny. (1986). “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control”, Journal of Political Economics 95,June, 461-488

Soliha; Euis dan Taswan, 2002. “Pengaruh Kebijakan Hutang terhadap Nilai Perusahaan serta Beberapa Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya”. Jurnal bisnis dan Ekonomi, p. 1-18.

Susila, Ihwan, 2003. “Konflik Keagenan dalam Privatisasi BUMN”. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, Vol. 2, No. 1, April 2003, p. 25-36.

DOI: 10.2317/jpis.v23i1.837

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1237 time(s)
PDF: 673 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.