ANALISA PENGARUH TEORI GONE FRAUD TERHADAP ACADEMIC FRAUD DI UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH SUKABUMI

Ismet Ismatullah(1*), Erlan Eriswanto(2)

(1) Program Studi Akuntans, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammaadiyah Sukabumi
(2) Program Studi Akuntansi, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammaadiyah Sukabumi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study intends to find out the cause of how big the effectiveness and role GONE theory against academic fraud. In this study, involving students from Sukabumi Muhammadiyah University from all exiting Program. Research conducted included in quantitative research and processed using the statistical program. The data used in this study uses primary data from questionnaires distributed to students and than do processed and analized in order to obtain results about the object and can be deduced.The results showed that of the four hypotheses proposed are two hypotheses were accepted and two rejected. Greed and Need which are internal factors inherent in a person are the root causes of academic fraud while opportunity and exposure factors which are outside factors do not have a role in the academic fraud.

 

Keywords: Fraud, Academic Fraud, and GONE Theory

Full Text:

PDF

References

Colby, B. (2006). Cheating; What is it (Online), (http://clas.asu.edu/files/AI%20Flier.pdf, diakses 18 Mei 2010).

Ghozali, Imam. Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program Amos 21.0. Semarang : Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2013.

Hartoto. Budaya Cheating: Penyakit dalam Dunia Pendidikan.

http://budimatindas.blogspot.co.id/2010/08/mencegah-kecurangan-akademik.html, diakses tanggal 08 Januari 2016

http://kisuta.com/2014-12-05/mencontek-cikal-bakal-plagiarisme-dan-korupsi, diakses tanggal 08 Januari 2016

http://www.republika.co.id/berita/pendidikan/berita-pendidikan/11/06/07/lmeuui-satu-

sekolah-mencontek-massal-saat-ujian-kepala-sekolah-dan-guru-diberhentikan, diakses tanggal 08 Januari 2016

http://www.kompasiana.com/elis.nvs/korupsi-kecil-itu-bernama menyontek_552e2e726ea834 9d178b45ac , diakses tanggal 08 Januari 2016

http://news.detik.com/internasional/2159488/skandalmencontek-massal-60-mahasiswa-harvard-kena-skorsing, diakses tanggal 08 Januari 2016

http://news.de.tikcom/internasional/2159488/skandalmencontek-massal-60-mahasiswa-harvard-kena-skorsing diakses tanggal 08 Januari 2016

http://www.konsultanstatistik.com/2010/10/simulasi-smartpls_852.html diakses tanggal 10 Januari 2016

Lambert, E.G., Hogan, N.L., & Barton, S.M. (2003). Collegiate academic dishonesty revisited: what have they done, how often have they done it, who does it, and why did they do it. Electronic Journal of Sosiology.

Muslimah. Persepsi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Terhadap Praktik-Praktik Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud)

Miranda, Sandra Marisa. Academic Dishonesty Understanding How Undergraduate Students Think and Act. ISATT 2011 Conference. University of Minho. Portugal. 2011

Sierra, J.J. dan M. R. Hyman. 2008. Ethical Antecendents of Cheating Intentions: Evidence of Mediation. Journal Academic Ethics, 6. Hal 51-66.

Sudarmo, Sawardi. Buku Panduan Fraud Auditing Ed.5. Jakarta: Pusat Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Pengawasan BPKP, 2008.

Tuanakotta, Theodorus M. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif Edisi 2. Jakarta : Penerbit Salemba Empat, 2012.

Transparancy Internatoinal, Corruption Perceptions Index 2014.

DOI: 10.23917/reaksi.v1i2.2731

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 2554 time(s)
PDF: 5228 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.