Biophilic Design: Virtual Nature Application in a Windowless Room

Wilda Maulina(1*), Dalhar Susanto(2)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Biophilic design recommends the connection between humans and nature because it positively influences human health and well-being. Due to the pandemic, some humans have been forced to work at home or in windowless rooms. This situation makes occupants unable to connect with nature. One solution in biophilic design is to present natural substitute elements such as virtual nature to reconnect nature in spaces that cannot access it. This paper discusses the application of virtual nature in windowless space which aims to help users get positive benefits for affective well-being (AWB) such as emotions and moods. This paper is compiled through literature exploration by synthesizing various previous research results. Based on several studies, shows that virtual nature is not just replacing real nature but is a boundary of the interior that reconnects with nature. This connection emotionally determines the quality of the windowless room so that it has benefits for the well-being of the occupants, especially affective well-being (emotions and moods).

Keywords

Affective Well-being; Biophilic Design; Boundary; Pandemic; Virtual Nature; Windowless

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmadi, K., & Ramezani, M. A. (2020). Iranian emotional experience and expression during the COVID-19 Crisis. Asia Pac Journal Public Health, 285-286.

“2019 Housing Statistics” by Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) by Anindita Maharrani, 2020, Available online: https://lokadata.id/artikel/rumah-di-ibu-kota-minim-jendela (accessed on 20 February 2021).

Browning, M. E., Mimnaugh, J., Van Riper, C. J., Laurent, H., & LaValle, S. (2020). Can simulate nature support mental health? comparing short, single-doses of 360-degree nature videos in virtual reality with the outdoors. Frontiers in Psychology.

Browning, M. H., Shipley, N., McAnirlin, O., Becker, D., Yu, C. P., Hartig, T., & Dzhambov, A. M. (2020). An actual natural setting improves mood better than its Virtual Counterpart: A meta-analysis of experimental data. Frontiers in Psychology.

Browning, W., Ryan, C., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design. New York: Terrapin Bright Green llc.

Calogiuri, G., Litleskare, S., & MacIntyre, T. (2019). Future-thinking through technological nature: Connecting or disconnecting. In Physical Activity in Natural Settings: Green and Blue Exercise; Donnelly, A.A., MacIntyre, T.E., Eds. Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 279–298.

Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X. D., & J., Z. J. (2020). The Psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res 287.

Capaldi, C.A.; Dopko, R.L.; Zelenski, J.M. The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 976

Choe, E. Y., Jorgensen, A., & Sheffield, D. (2020). Simulated natural environments bolster the effectiveness of a mindfulness program: A comparison with a relaxation-based intervention. Journal of Environmental Psychology.

Croome, D. (2001). Creating the Productive Workplace. Canada: Routledge

Downton, p., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., & Ross, P. (2016). Biophilic Design Application: Putting Theory and Patterns into Built Environment Practice. The international conference on Design and Technology (pp. 59-65). Knowledge. E.

Eger, R., & Maridal, J. (2015). A statistical meta-analysis of the wellbeing literature. Journal of Wellbeing, 45-74.

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3/4), 169-200.

European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Psychosocial Risks and Stress at Work; European Agency for Safety and Health at Work: Bilbao, Spain, 2018; Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/en/themes/psychosocialrisks-and-stress (accessed on 25 February 2021).

Fawaz, M., & Samaha, A. (2020). E‐learning: Depression, anxiety, and stress symptomatology among Lebanese university students during COVID-19 quarantine. Wiley; Nursing forum, 1-6.

Felly, R., & Susanto, D. (2020). The changing effects through biophilic design in increasing elderly memory capacity. Case study: Sasana Tresna Werdha Yayasan Karya Bakti Ria Pembangunan, Cibubur. FCIC 5.

Gerber, S. M., Jeitziner, M.-M., Sänger, S. D., Knobel, S. E., Marchal-Crespo, L., Muri, R. M., . . . Nef, T. (2019). Comparing the Relaxing Effects of Different Virtual Reality Environments in the Intensive Care Unit: Observational Study. JMIR PERIOPERATIVE MEDICINE, 1-9

Hartig, T., Böök, A., Garvill, J., Olsson, T., & Gärling, T. (1996). Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 37, 378-393.

Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking Restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 109-123.

Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., & Lundstrom, J. N. (2019). Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment. Scientific Reports Vol. 9, 1-37.

Hedblom, M., Gunnarsson, B., Iravani, B., Knez, I., Schaefer, M., Thorsson, P., & Lundstrom, J. N. (2019). Sounds of Nature in the City: No Evidence of Bird Song Improving Stress Recovery. Environmental Research and Public Health, 1-12

Kahneman, D., & Deaton, A. (2010). High income improves the evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 16489–16493.

Kellert, S. R., Heerwagen, J. H., & Mador, M. L. (2008). Biophilic Design. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Litleskare, S., MacIntyre, T. E., & Calogiuri, G. (2020). Enable, Reconnect and Augment: A New ERA of Virtual Nature Research and Application. Environmental Research and Public Health, 1-19.

Lee, S., & Chang, M. (2000). Indoor and Outdoor Air Quality Investigation at school in hongkong. Pergamoun Journal, 09-113.

McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (1992). The Hannover Principles. Design for Sustainability.

McSweeney, J.; Rainham, D.G.C.; Johnson, S.A.; Sherry, S.B.; Singelton, J. Indoor nature exposure (INE): A health-promotion framework. Health Promot. Int. 2015, 30, 126–139.

Mehta, Zhu, & Cheema. (2012). impact of sound and vibration on cognitive performance.

Millar, L. (2010). Boundaries. In L. B. Peressut, I. Forino, & G. V. Postiglione, Interior Wor(l)ds (pp. 112-115). Torino: Umberto Allemandi&C.

Mayer, F.S.; Frantz, C.M.; Bruehlman-Senecal, E.; Dolliver, K. Why Is Nature Beneficial? The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Environ. Behav. 2009, 41, 607–643.

McCarthy, C. (2005). Toward a Definition of Interiority. Space and Culture Vol.8 No.2, 112-125

Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & McEwan, K. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic Well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1145-1167.

The Reason, J., & Brand, J. (1975). Motion Sickness. Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press.

Russel, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review 110(1), 145-172.

Selhub, E. M., & Logan, A. C. (2012). Your Brain on Nature: The Science of Nature’s Influence on Your Health, Happiness and Vitality. Mississauga: John Wiley & Sons.

Shanahan, D.F.; Astell-Burt, T.; Barber, E.A.; Brymer, E.; Cox, D.T.C.; Dean, J.; Depledge, M.; Fuller, R.A.; Hartig, T.; Irvine, K.N. Nature-Based Interventions for Improving Health and Wellbeing: The Purpose, the People and the Outcomes. Sports 2019, 7, 141.

Sherman, W., & Craig, A. (2003). Understanding Virtual Reality. Interface, Application, and Design. San Fransisco, CA, USA,: Barsky, B.A., Ed Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Tan, W., Hao, F., McIntyre, R. S., Jiang, L., Jiang, X., Zhang, L., . . . Tam, W. (2020). Is returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic stressful? A study on immediate mental health status and psychoneuroimmunity prevention measures of the Chinese workforce. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, 84-92.

Tee, M. L., Tee, C. A., Anlacan, J. P., Aligam, K. J., Reyes, P. W., & Kuruchittham, V. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines. Journal of Affective Disorders, 379-391.

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard University Press.

Xiong, J., Lipsitz, O., Nasri, F., Lui, L. M., Gill, H. P., Chen-Li, D., . . . McIntyre, R. S. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A Systematic Review. Affective Disorders, 55-56.

Yatmo, Y. A., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2013). Sneezing as a Form of Transaction between the active body and space. Senses and Society vol.8, 193-207.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 213 time(s)
PDF: 184 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.