The Comparison of Using Think Pair Share (TPS) and Note Taking Pairs Techniques Toward Students’ Writing Ability In Term of Descriptive Text
Soifah Latifah(1*)(1) Universitas Nurul Huda Sukaraja
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
The objective of this research is to identify whether there is a significant difference between using Think Pair Share and Note-Taking Pairs techniques toward students' writing ability in terms of descriptive text at tenth grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro academic year 2013/2014. There are four hypotheses in this research, those are; (1) The student's score of using the Think Pair Share technique is high seen by the result of the post-test, (2) The student's score of using the Note-Taking Pairs technique is high seen by the result of the post-test, (3) The student's score of students' writing ability in term of descriptive text high far seen by the result of the post-test, (4) The student's result of the comparison of using Think Pair Share and Note-Taking Pairs techniques toward student's writing ability in term of descriptive text is high seen by the result of the post-test. The subjects of the research were the tenth grade. The population of this research was the students in the tenth grade of SMA Muhammadiyah 1 Metro. The researcher took two classes. The first class is X3 as the experimental class. The second class is X4 as the control class. The samples of subjects were 40 students. The method of investigation is held through quantitative research. The design in this research is True Experimental design. In this experiment, the researcher applies Pre-Test Post-Test Control Group Design. The researcher uses cluster stratified random sampling as a technique sampling.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, S. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revi). Bina Aksara.
Asrifan, A. (2016). English Literature and Language Review The Effectiveness of Think-Pair-Share Technique in Improving Students ’ Speaking Ability and I nterest. English Literature and Language Review, 2(3), 24–35. http://arpgweb.com/?ic=journal&journal=9&info=aims
Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing Students’ Language Skills through Blended Learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(3), 220–229. https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%7B&%7Ddb=ehh%7B&%7DAN=117018543%7B&%7Dsite=eds-live%7B&%7Dscope=site
Blanchard, K., & Root, C. (2010). Ready to Write: Perfecting Paragraphs (Fourth). Pearson Education. https://www.academia.edu/download/55673885/9780131363328_answers.pdf
Cahyani, F. (2018). The Use of Think Pair Share Technique to Improve Students’ Speaking Performance. Research in English and Education, 3(1), 76–90. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/READ/article/view/9237
Creswell., John W. (2014). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Creswell, Jhon W. (1999). Mixed-Method Research: Intrduction and Application. In Handbook of educational policy: Vol. Academic P (pp. 455–472). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978012174698850045X
Damayanti, I. L. (2017). From storytelling to story writing: The implementation of reading to learn (R2L) pedagogy to teach english as a foreign language in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v6i2.4870
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a Mode of Learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2), 122–128. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0010-096X%28197705%2928%3A2%3C122%3AWAAMOL%3E2.0.CO%3B2-H
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gerald, B. (2018). A Brief of Independent, Dependent and One Sample t-test. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 4(2), 50–54. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20180402.13
Hampton, T. (2018). Writing from History. In Writing from History. Cornell University Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501711183
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R., & Daelemans, W. (2018). Adolescents’ social background and non-standard writing in online communication. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil
Ishartono, N., Desstya, A., Prayitno, H. J., & Sidiq, Y. (2021). The Quality of HOTS-Based Science Questions Developed by Indonesian Elementary School Teachers. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 236–245. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.33813
Ishartono, N., Toyib, M., & Alam, A. (2019). Penggunaan Graf Pohon dalam Mengajarkan Konsep Mahram. Edukasia: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 14(2), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.21043/edukasia.v14i2.4575
Kaddoura, M. (2013). Think pair share: A teaching learning strategy to enhance students ’ critical thinking. Education Research Quarterly, 36(4), 3–24.
Kusuma, F. W., & Aisyah, M. N. (2012). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar Akuntansi Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 10(2), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v10i2.912
Mays, C. (2017). Writing complexity, one stability at a time: Teaching writing as a complex system. College Composition and Communication, 68(3), 559–585.
Menary, R. (2007). Writing as thinking. Language Sciences, 29(5), 621–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005
Morreale, S. P., Valenzano, J. M., & Bauer, J. A. (2017). Why communication education is important: a third study on the centrality of the discipline’s content and pedagogy. Communication Education, 66(4), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2016.1265136
Permana, D., Suadiyatno, T., & Harmawati, S. (2019). Note-Taking Pairs Strategy Towards Students’ Critical Thinking Ability In Reading Comprehension. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v5i2.1797
Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving Content Validity of Self-Regulated learning Scale (The Comparison of Aiken Index and Expanded Gregory Index). Research and Evaluation in Education, 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suharsimi, A. (2006). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Sukandi, S. S. (2016). Students’ Personal “Colors” in Self-Evaluation Essays as the Post-Process Pedagogy in Teaching Writing (A Descriptive Study on EFL Composition Learning Practice in Indonesia). Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language Teaching, 4(2), 361–373.
Sutama. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R&D). Fairuz Media.
Yoandita, P. E. (2019). An Analysis of Student’s Ability and Difficulties in Writing Descriptive Text. Jurnal JOEPALLT, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.35194/jj.v7i1.534
Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning. In TESOL Quarterly (Vol. 16, Issue 2, pp. 195–209). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0580-6
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 218 time(s)PDF: 215 time(s)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
