KINERJA GURU SD DI KECAMATAN SLAWI Suatu tinjauan aspek Persepsi Guru Tentang Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Budaya Kerja, dan Fasilitas Pembelajaran

Nanik Wahyu Indriasih(1*)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The main objectives of this study are 1) to analyze the contribution of teacher’s perception of headmaster’s leadership, job ethics, and learning facilities altogether on state elementary school teacher’s performance in Sub-District of Slawi, 2) to analyze the contribution of teacher’s perception of headmaster’s leadership on state elementary school teacher’s performance in Sub- District of Slawi, 3) to analyze the contribution of job ethics on state elementary school teacher’s performance in Sub-District of Slawi, 4) to analyze the contribution of learning facilities on state elementary school teacher’s in Sub-District of Slawi, and 5) to analyze the variable which dominantly contributes on state elementary school teacher’s performance in Sub-District of Slawi. A quantitative approach is used in this study. The location of the study is in all state elementary schools of Slawi Sub-District, Tegal Regency. Population number of this study are 190 teachers of state elementary schools in Sub-District of Slawi. The sample of this study are 127 teachers selected with a sampling technique based on Isaac and Michaels’s empiric formula. Data are collected by doing a documentation of library research and using questionnaires. Data are analyzed using regression analysis. Based on data analysis results and previous discussion, it could be concluded that 1) teacher’s perception of headmaster’s leadership, job ethics, and learning facilities simultaneously affect positively and significantly on state elementary school teacher’s performance in Sub-District of Slawi 74.5%. This is shown by acquirement of rest result F with a = 5%. 2) Teacher’s perception of headmaster’s leadership partially contributes positively on teacher’s performance of state elementary schools in Sub-District of Slawi 8.78%. This is shown by acquirement of rest result t with a = 5%. 3) Job ethics partially contributes positively on teacher’s performance in Sub-District of Slawi 59.54%. This is shown by acquirement of rest result t with a = 5%. 4) Learning facilities partially contributes positively on teacher’s performance of state elementary schools in Sub-District of Slawi with 6.20%. This is shown by acquirement of rest result t with a= 5%. 5) Result of assumption test classical indicates that regression model do not experience of classic assumption problem or diffraction so that can be expressed by BLUE (Best, Linear, Unbiased, and Estimator).

Keywords

teacher’s performance; learning facilities; job ethics; leadership

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2004. Organisasi dan Administrasi Pendidikan Teknik dan Kejuruan. Jakarta: PT. Radja Grafindo Persada. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2008. Manajemen Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Azwar. 2004. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Budiyono. 2004. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Sebelas Maret University Press. Coulson, 2003. Word Education Forum. http:www.pqums.umi.com (diakses 2 Januari 2009) Danim, Sudarwan. 2003. Agenda Pembaharuan Sistem Pendidikan.Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. Djamarah. 2004. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Depdiknas. 2006. Panduan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Jakarta. Dewi. 2008. Pengembangan Karier Guru. (http://dewi-cjt.blogspot.com/2008/07) didownload tangal 20 Maret 2009. Ghozali, imam.2001.Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Ghozali, imam.2006.Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. Hanushek, Eric A., and Margareth E. Raymond. 2005. Does School accountability lead to improved students performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Manajemen Vol.24 No.2, 2005, pp:297-327. Hadi, S . 2000. Statistik. Jilid 2.Yogyakarta: Andi Offset. Isjoni. 2007. Kinerja Guru. www.Pendidikannetwork.com (diakses 4 Februari 2009). Isjoni. 2008. Bersinergi dalam Perubahan Menciptakan Pendidikan Berkualitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar. Kelley, Robert C., Bill Thorton, and Richard Daughherty. 2005. Relationships between measures of Leadership and School Climate. Education Chula Vista: fall 2005. Vol.125. pp:17-25 Komariah,Aan. 2005. Visionari leadership menuju sekolah efektif. Bandung Bumi Aksara. Kurniati, W. O. 2005. Hubungan Antara Minat Terhadap Pengembangan Karir dengan Perilaku Proaktif pada Karyawan Kantor Pusat Bank Jateng. Jurnal Psikologi UNDIP. Vol. 2 No. 2. Leung, Mei-Yung, John K.W.Chan, and Zhaohong Wang. 2005. Impact of School Facilities on Working Behavior of Teachers. Mangkunegara.2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan.Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. Moedjiarto. 2006. Sekolah Unggul. Jakarta: Duta Graha Pustaka. Mulyasa, E. 2005. Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Mulyasa, E. 2005 Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. Bandung : PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Mulyasa, E. 2006. Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Prefesional. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.. Nana. 2007. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya. Nasution. 2001. Manajemen Mutu Terpadu. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Namawi, Handari. 2006.Manajemen Strategik Organization Non Profit Bidang Pemerintahan. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press. Ofoegbu, F.I.2004. Teacher Motivation: a fakctor for classrom effectiveness and school improvement in Nigeria.. College Student Journal. Mar 2004 Vol. 38 Issue 1, p81-89, gp, 2 charts Robbins, Stephen P. 2002. Prinsip-prinsip Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta:Erlangga. Robbins, Stephen P. 2006. Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Inc Sedarmayanti. 2005. Sumber Daya Manusia dan Produktivitas Kerja. Jakarta: Mandar Maju. Simamora, Henry. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE-YKPN Press. Sugiyono.2007.Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sulistiyani, Ambar teguh. 2004. Memahami Good Govermance dalam Perspektif Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Gava Media. Surya, M 2002. Antara Harapan, Kenyataan, dan Keharusan. Jakarta: Grasindo. Surya. 2003. Percikan Perjuangan Guru: Semarang: CV.Aneka Ilmu. Sutarto. 2002. Dasar-dasar Organisasi. Yogyakarta: UGM Press. Taliziduhu. 2005. Teori Budaya Organisasi. Jakarta:PT. Rineka Cipta. Teguh. 2004. Cara Mudah Melakukan Analisis Statistik dengan SPSS. Yogyakarta: Gava Media. Timpe, Dale A. 2004. Seri Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Kinerja. Terjemahan. Jakarta: LP3S. Usman, Husaini. 2006. Manajemen Teori, Praktek dan Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Wahjosumidjo. 2002. Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.. Whitfield, Patricia T., and Beverly J. Klug.2004. Teachers as “Healers”. 21stCentury Possibility? Or necessity? Multicultural Perspektives Vol.6.2004, pp43-50. Wilkins, Raphael. 2003. Scools as Organizations: Some Contemporary Issue. Yulk,Gay.2005.Kepemimpinan dalam Organisasi.Jakarta: Indeks Kelompok Gramedia. Zamroni. 2001. Pendidikan untuk Demokrasi: Tantangan Menuju Civil Society. Yogyakarta: Bigraf.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 399 time(s)
PDF: 190 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.