Pengembangan Kompetensi Pedagogik Menuju Sekolah Bermutu

Khusnan Khusnan(1*), Budi Sutrisno(2)

(1) SDN Jetiskarangpung 1 Sragen
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author


The purpose of this study was to determine the development paedagogical com petence to school quality at SDN Banaran 1 described in two subfocuses, namely: 1) Assess the characteristics of the development of curriculum related to the subject matter teachers, 2) Assessing the educational characteristics of the learning organization. Data were col lected through interviews (indepth interviews), observation and document. Data analysis was carried out in the field before and during the field with Miles and Hubberman models interactively through a process of data reduction, data display and conclusion drawing. Results and discussion concluded that the profiles of development paedagogical competence toward school quality at SDN Banaran 1 is the development of theories that exist in previous studies. The development of the theory can be aware of the characteristics of development paedagogical competence performed SDN Banaran 1 as: placing the school commit tee and education experts as partners, to establish communication with parents / guardians, provide training to teachers in selecting appropriate learning strategies and to develop learning materials, as well as reducing the burden of additional teachers. Moreover, in implementing educational learning, SDN Banaran 1 provides enrichment and improvement as well as the addition of the grade six class hours in particular, carry out learning inter action optimally position the child as a subject of learning, contextual learning materials, learning through small group and the maximum using facility to stimulate student learning.


pedagogic; competence; quality

Full Text:



Aslam, Hassan.D; Rasheed, Muhammad .I. 2010. “Hindering Factors of Beginning Teachers’

High Performance in Higher Education Pakistan (Case Study of IUB-The Islamia University

of Bahawalpur)” International Journal of Education, Vol. 2, No. 1:E9, ISSN 1948-5476. p. 1-12.

Hall, Cedric dan Kidman, Joanna. 2004. Teaching and Learning: mapping the Contextual Influences. International Education Journal Vol 5, No 331-341.

Deal, Debby;White, C Stephen. 2006. “Voices from the Classroom: Literacy Beliefs and Practices of Two Novice Elementary Teachers“. Journal of Research in Childhood Education.

ProQuest Research Library. pg. 313 ,Vol. 20, No. 4.

Depdiknas. 2007. Model Rencana Pembelajaran di SD.Jakarta: Dirjen Mandik dasmen.

Depdiknas. 2009. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.Jakarta: Dirjen Man dikdasmen.

Depdiknas. 2009. Panduan Pengembangan Indikator.Jakarta:Dirjen Mandik dasmen.

Depdiknas. 2007. Pedoman Penilaian Hasil Belajar di SD.Jakarta: Dirjen Mandikdasmen.

Feng. (2006). China’s Recent Curriculum Reform: Progress And Problems. Planning and

Changing Vol. 37. No. 1&2. pg. 131-144.

Lamancusa, John S. etc. 2008. The Learning Factory: Industry-Partnered Active Learning.

Journal of Engineering Education. pg. 1-15.

Miles & Huberman. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif.Jakarta: UI- Press.

Moleong, Lexy. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.Bandung: PT. Rosda Karya.

Permenpan dan Reformasi Birokrasi No. 19. 2009. tentang Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kredit.

Permendiknas No. 16 tanggal 4 Mei 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru.

Permendiknas No. 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi.

Permendiknas No. 41Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Proses.

Permendiknas. No. 74 Tahun 2008 tentang Guru.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 744 time(s)
PDF: 338 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.