Penguatan Aspek-Aspek Nature of Science and Technology dalam Pembelajaran bagi MGMP IPA Kabupaten Kaur Provinsi Bengkulu

Euis Nursaadah(1*), Agus Sundaryono(2), Bhakti Karyadi(3)

(1) University of Bengkulu
(2) University of Bengkulu
(3) University of Bengkulu
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Teaching the concept of science according to nature is important and will work well if the teacher has an understanding of the nature of science. The IPA MGMP in Kaur District facilitates teachers to upgrade their knowledge and skills to improve the learning process. The topics discussed included: 1) discussing questions on the National Examination and National Science Olympiad, 2) making parameters for the Final and Middle Examination questions 3) Classroom Action Research, and 4) learning models. No one has yet discussed how to teach science in accordance with the aspects of nature of science and technology (NOST). The purpose of this training is to improve understanding of NOST aspects which consists of 4 steps: 1) equalizing perceptions of the importance of NOST, 2) Analyzing aspects of NOST 3) and increasing teacher understanding of aspects of NOST in learning. This training was conducted for 50 teachers in Kaur District through the ICARE method (Introduction, Connection, Application, Reflection and Extend). Program evaluation is carried out by adopting the CIPP design (Context, Input, Process and Product). The results show that teachers already think that science is not just a concept of chemistry, physics, and biology. In addition, the teacher's view of scientific research is not only limited to proving concepts but also involves new findings that support technological development.

Keywords

Training, NOST, Science Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bell, R.L., & Lederman, N.G., (2002). Understanding of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issue. The Nauture of Science and Decision Making. 352-377

Dagher, Z R & Erduran S, (2016). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education why does it matter?. Science Education

Demirdogan B et al.,(2015) Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Res Sci Educ

Dogan, N., & El-Khalick, F., (2007). Turkish grade 10 students' and science teachers' conception of nature of science: a national study. Journal of Research and Science Teaching. 45(10),1083-1112

Educational Development Center. Prioritizing Reform, Innovation, and Opportunities for Reaching Indonesia’s Teachers, Administrators, and Students (PRIORITAS) (2012). http://idd.edc.org/projects/prioritas

Hanley, Michael. (2009). Discovering Instructional Design 13: ICARE Model – Middlesex University’s experience. [Available Online]. http://elearningcurve.edublogs.org/. (diakses tanggal 19 Februari 2015)

Lederman, NG., El-Khalick, F., Bell, R.L., & Schwatz, SR. (2002). View of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research In Science & Teaching 39, 497-521.

Madaus, G.F. & Scriven, M.S. & Stuffebeam, D.L. (1993). Evaluation models, viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Olson, J.K, (2018) The inclusion of the nature of science in nine recent international science education standards documents. Science Education

Temel, S., Sen, S.,& Ozcan, O (2017). The development of the nature of science view scale (NOSvs) at university level. Research in Science & Techology Education, 1-14

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 230 time(s)
PDF: 420 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.