KOMPARASI PENERAPAN MODEL STAD DAN TGT TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR DAN AKTIVITAS SISWA (STUDI PADA SISWA KELAS V MATA PELAJARAN PKN DI SDN BENDO 1, KEC. PARE, KAB. KEDIRI)
Kukuh Andri Aka(1*)(1) 
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
of cooperative learning. There are several models that made the researchers are interested in knowing
the signi.. cance of the difference to the learning outcomes and student activities, namely the model of
STAD and TGT.The design of this research is quantitative research with this type of quasi-experimental
with the factorial design version of nonequivalent control group design 2x2 (Tuckman, 1999). Based on
data from pretest and posttest scores can be seen that a good learning outcomes for grade STAD and
TGT have increased, the increase amounted to 22.73% STAD class and class TGT by 20.91%. STAD
class has increased by 1.82% higher than TGT class. Similarly, in the students’ learning activities,
STAD model to get the student activity by 82.44% and amounted to 80.91% of IGT. STAD class rose
1.53% higher than TGT class. Based on the hypothesis test concluded that (1) there is no signi.. cant
difference in learning outcomes between the application of the model STAD and TGT, and (2) there is no
signi.. cant difference in learning activities between the application of the model STAD and TGT. Both
models are equally able to bene.. t in improving student learning outcomes and student activity. In this
study, there is no one model that can be said to be superior significantly from one another.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Hasan, S. 2012. Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif STAD, TGT, dan integrasi STAD+TGT
terhadap keterampilan metakognisi, berpikir kritis, dan hasil belajar kognitif IPA-Biologi SD
kelas V di Kota Ternate.Skripsi tidak diterbitkan.Malang: FMIPA UM
Isjoni. 2010. Cooperative Learning Efektifitas Pembelajaran Kelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Joyce, B. 2009.Models Of Teaching. Terjemahan Achmad Fawaid dan Ateilla Mirza. 2011.
Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Khasanah, D.R. 2011.Komparasi Hasil Belajar Matematika Antara Siswa Yang Diberi Metode
STAD Dengan TGTKelas VIII MTs Negeri Sumberagung Jetis Bantul.Skripsi tidak diterbitkan.
Malang: FMIPA UM.
Murdiono, A. 2009.Perbedaan Efektivitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD
(Students Teams Division Achievement) dan TGT (Teams Games Tournament) terhadap
Aktivitas Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa.Skripsi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: FE UM.
Reigulth, C.M. 1983.Instructional-Design Theories and Models.Volume II.A New paradigm of
Instructional Theory.London: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Rusman. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT
Rajagrasindo Persada.
Sigit, D & Fajaroh F. 2006.Implikasi Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD (Students
Teams Division Achievement) dan TGT (Teams Games Tournament) Terhadap Kualitas Proses
dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa SMA Negeri Dampit Kabupaten Malang.Jurnal Pendidikan
dan Pembelajaran, 13 (1).
Siswoko, H. 2012. Komparasi hasil belajar metode teams games tournament (TGT) dengan Student
Teams Achievement Division (STAD) pada sub konsep perpindahan kalor. Skripsi tidak
diterbitkan.Jakarta: Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Slavin, R. E. 2005.Cooperative Learning Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung: Nusa Media.
SlavinR.E.&Madden N. A.1979. School Practices That Improve Race Relations.American Reseach
Educational Journal.vol. 16 no. 2 169-180.
Shoolihah, A. 2012.Perbandingan Metode Pembelajaran Teams Games Tournament dan Student
Teams Achievement Divisiondalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa.Economic Education
Analysis Journal, 1 (2): 1-7.
Tuckman, B.W., 1999. Condating Educational Research. 5th Edition. Orlando: Harcourt brace
College Publisher.
Wahab, A. A. 1997. Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan. Proyek Pendidikan Guru Sekolah
Dasar. Depdikbud.
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 1000 time(s)PDF: 1330 time(s)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.