Quality Economic Growth as an Indicator of Economic Development

Ida Nuraini, Happy Febrina Hariyani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v20i1.7104


This study aims to map the districts/cities in East Java that is classified as having quality economic growth, as well as formulating a concept of quality economic growth by examining several social and economic indicators such as unemployment, income distribution across regions, income distribution among economic sectors, equity investment, and poverty. Using Klassen's typology analysis, it is found that most (19 regions) districts and cities in East Java are in the advanced category but depressed. Meanwhile, there are 8 regions that are classified as advanced and growing rapidly and 10 regions are classified as regions that can grow fast and 1 region classified as relatively underdeveloped, namely Tuban District. While the regions that have qualified economic growth are Lamongan District, Jember District, Probolinggo, Madiun, Batu, Blitar, Pasuruan and Mojokerto. Based on the Fix Effect regression model, it can be concluded that the number of industries and Human Development Index have a significant negative effect on economic growth while the contribution of the primary sector has a significant and positive effect on economic growth.


East Java; Income inequality; Quality economic growth

Full Text:



Hariyani, H. F., Priyarsono, S. S., & Asmara, A. (2016). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, hlm. 32-44 Vol 5 No 2. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 5(2), 32–44.

Joseph. E, S. (2001). Development Thinking at the Millennium. Washington DC.

Mlachila, M., Tapsoba, R., & Tapsoba, S. J. A. (2014). A Quality of Growth Index for Developing Countries : A Proposal. IMF Working Paper (Vol. WP/14/12).

Montobbio, F. (2002). An evolutionary model of industrial growth and structural change, 13, 387–414.

National Research Council. (1986). Population Growth and Economic Development: Policy Questions. Washington DC. Retrieved from https://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~walker/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/NRC1986.pdf

Nuraini, I. (2017). Kualitas Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Daerah Kabupaten/Kota di Jawa Timur, 79–93.

Pegkas, P., & Tsamadias, C. (2014). Does Higher Education Affect Economic Growth ? The Case of Greece, (September), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2014.894551

Prasetyo, P. E. (2008). The Quality of Growth: Peran Teknologi dan Investasi Human Capital sebagai Pemacu Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Berkualitas, 1, 1–15.

Putu, N., Eka, M., Utama, M. S., Ekonomi, J., Fakultas, P., Universitas, E., … Klassen, T. (2009). Analisis pertumbuhan ekonomi dan ketimpangan pendapatan antar kecamatan di kabupaten gianyar, 119–128.

Saviotti, P. P., & Frenken, K. (2008). Export variety and the economic performance of countries, 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-007-0081-5

Silva, E. G., & Teixeira, A. A. C. (2011). Does structure influence growth ? A panel data econometric assessment of “ relatively less developed ” countries , 1979 – 2003, 20(2), 457–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr003

Solow, R. M. (1962). Technical Progress, Capital Formation, and Economic Growth. The American Review, 52(3), 76–86.

Sutarno, S., & Kuncoro, M. (2003). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Dan Ketimpangan Antar Kecamatan Di Kabupaten Banyumas, 1993-2000. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 8(2).

Syafrizal. (1997, March). Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Ketimpangan Regional Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat. PRISMA, 27–38.

Teixeira, A. A. C., & Queirós, A. S. S. (2016). Economic growth, human capital and structural change: A dynamic panel data analysis. Research Policy, (October 2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.006

Thomas, V., Dailimi, M., Dhareshwar, A., Kaufmann, D., Kishor, N., López, R., & Wang, Y. (2000). The quality of growth. The World Bank.

Yuliani, T. (2015). Pertumbuhan ekonomi dan ketimpangan pendapatan antar kabupaten di kalimantan timur, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v7i1.Journal

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 661 time(s)
PDF: 560 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.