Reforming Spending Policy and Its Impact on Indonesia’s Economy: The Case of Fuel Subsidy and Infrastructure

Muhammad Anas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jep.v20i1.7733

Abstract

The quality of Indonesia’s infrastructure up until 2014 was considered uncompetitive, and one of the reasons was that there was not enough money spent on infrastructure, and too much on fuel subsidy. In November 2014, the government of Indonesia decided to cut the expenditure for fuel subsidy and reallocate the money to invest on public services. This study was conducted with the intention to quantify the impact of the program on economic growth and income distribution in Indonesia using Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) model. Simulation results indicated that the impact from social and human capital infrastructure was bigger than that of economic infrastructure, although the simulation for both categories resulted in an increase of sectoral output and domestic income. Therefore, improving infrastructure, especially social, is vital to stimulate economic activity in the long run.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akinyemi, Opeyemi, Philip O. Alege, and Oluseyi Ajayi. 2017. “A Simulation of the Removal of Fuel Subsidy and the Performance of the Agricultural Sector in Nigeria Using a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Approach.” Covenant Journal of Business & Social Sciences (CJBSS) 8(1):60–70.

Aschauer, David. 1989. “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics 23(September 1988):177–200.

Bonakdarpour, Mohsen, Robert Brodesky, and Karen A. Campbell. 2014. Transportation Infrastructure Investment : Macroeconomic and Industry Contribution of the Federal Highway and Mass Transit Program.

Chani, Muhammad Irfan, Sajjad Ahmad Jan, Zahid Pervaiz, and Amatul R. Chaudhary. 2014. “Human Capital Inequality and Income Inequality: Testing for Causality.” Quality and Quantity 48(1):149–56.

Diop, Ndiame. 2014. Why Is Reducing Energy Subsidies a Prudent, Fair, and Transformative Policy for Indonesia?

Fathurrahman, Fahman. 2014. “Simulating Indonesian Fuel Subsidy Reform: A Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Analysis.” Middle East Technical University.

Ford, Robert and Pierre Poret. 1991. “Infrastructure and Private Sector Productivity.” Economic Studies (17).

Indonesia's Cabinet Secretariat. 2015. “Berterima Kasih Kepada Rakyat, Presiden Jokowi Jelaskan Alokasi Pengalihan Anggaran Subsidi BBM.” Berita. Retrieved February 12, 2016 (http://setkab.go.id/berterima-kasih-kepada-rakyat-presiden-jokowi-jelaskan-alokasi-pengalihan-anggaran-subsidi-bbm/).

Indonesia's Ministry of Finance. Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat. 2010-2014. Available at https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/laporan/laporan-keuangan-pemerintah-pusat/

KataData. 2015. “Kemana Pengalihan Dana Subsidi BBM.” Infografik Energi. Retrieved March 12, 2016 (https://katadata.co.id/infografik/2015/05/27/kemana-pengalihan-dana-subsidi-bbm#sthash.mcJC2EQx.b06q2jn0.dpbs).

Palei, Tatyana. 2015. “Assessing the Impact of Infrastructure on Economic Growth and Global Competitiveness.” Procedia Economics and Finance 23(October 2014):168–75.

Raihan, Selim. 2011. “Infrastructure and Growth and Poverty in Bangladesh.” Munich Personal RePEc Archive (37882).

Santoso, Singgih. 2018. Menguasai Statistik Dengan SPSS 25. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Schwab, Klaus and World Economic Forum. 2014. The Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015.

Widodo, Tri, Gumilang Aryo Sahadewo, Sekar Utami Setiastuti, and Maftuchatul Chaerriyah. 2012. Impact of Fuel Subsidy Removal on Government Spending. Jakarta.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 66 time(s)
PDF: 41 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.