Co-authorship Pattern in Research on Energy Sector: Social Network Analysis

Siti Aisyah, Ria Hardiyati



A nation capacity to provide clean and affordable energy is crucial for the development of its economy. Indonesia energy mix still rely heavily on fossil fuels, but a concerted effort to explore a more sustainable energy has been laid out by the government, including promoting studies and providing incentives for research in the area of sustainable energy. This paper tries to examine the trend of energy research in Indonesia, the theme of research in the field of energy and to find out which institution has conducted a rigorous research and actively producing publications in this field. The study uses data of international research publications from World of Science (WOS) during 1997-2014. Data Analysis using Social Network Analysis (SNA) with UCINET, NetDraw, and VOSViewer software. The result shows that the number of international publications on energy in Indonesia are increasing and most publications are of research collaboration with institutions from other country. Based on keywords that frequently appear which are biomass, biodiesel, and ethanol, it can be concluded that popular research theme on energy in Indonesia is renewable energy. This paper concludes with the findings on institutions with the highest rank in renewable energy publications, those are Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM), Institut Pertanian Bandung (IPB), and Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia/Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI). Research collaborations with institutions from around the globe will improve the performance of research and development bodies in Indonesia, which will only benefit the economy in the long run.


Scientometrics; Social Network Analysis; Energy, Development Economics

Full Text:



Archambault, É., Caruso, J., Côté, G., & Larivière, V. (2009). Bibliometric Analysis of Leading Countries in Energy Research. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (pp. 14–17).

Barabási, A.-L., & Frangos, J. (2002). Linked: the new science of networks science of networks. Basic Books.

Changlin, G. (2007). China National Energy Startegy and Policy2020: Policy Research on EnergyResearch and Development. Beijing: China Sustainable Energy Program. Retrieved January 2014 from Www. Efchina. Org.

Cheng, B. S. (1995). An investigation of cointegration and causality between energy consumption and economic growth. The Journal of Energy and Development, 21(1), 73–84.

Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.

Gupta, B. M. (2013). Bangladesh: A scientometric analysis of national publications output in S&T, 2001-10. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 33(1).

Hartinah, S., Tupan, T., Iswanti, S., Rahartri, R., & Prahastuti, S. (2012). Peta perkembangan bidang energi berdasarkan literatur kelabu di indonesia. BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 30(2), 139–152.

Kraft, J., & Kraft, A. (1978). On the relationship between energy and GNP. The Journal of Energy and Development, 401–403.

Lakitan, B., Hidayat, D., & Herlinda, S. (2012). Scientific productivity and the collaboration intensity of Indonesian universities and public R&D institutions: Are there dependencies on collaborative R&D with foreign institutions? Technology in Society, 34(3), 227–238.

Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M. L., & de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1462–1480.

Lukman, B. (2012). Analisis bibliometrika berdasarkan pendekatan co-words: pemetaan laporan hasil penelitian pusat penelitian biologi-LIPI. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Nascimento, M. A., Sander, J., & Pound, J. (2003). Analysis of SIGMOD’s co-authorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record, 32(3), 8–10.

Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453.

Pappiptek. (2014). Indikator Iptek Indonesia 2013. Pappiptek LIPI.

Pouris, A., & Pouris, A. (2009). The state of science and technology in Africa (2000--2004): A scientometric assessment. Scientometrics, 79(2), 297–309.

Ranganathan, C., & Balasubramani, R. (2014). Scientometric profile of research activities on green energy: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 2(1), 23–30.

Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21). (2009). Renewables. Global Status Report. 2009 Update. Paris.

Sivasekaran, K. (2015). India’s Contribution on Renewable Energy Research Output: A Scientometric Study. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 4(4), 311–316.

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

To, H., Wijeweera, A., & Charles, M. B. (2012). Energy consumption and economic growth--The case of Australia. Business School, Southern Cross University.

Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications (Vol. 8). Cambridge university press.

Yoganingrum, A. (2004). Bibliometrics method for knowledge mapping: An application on the scientific research in Indonesia. วารสาร บรรณารักษศาสตร์, 24(2), 1–14.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1278 time(s)
PDF: 358 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.