Pre-service mathematics teachers’ nature of understanding of the tangent function

Priestly Malambo(1*)

(1) Department of Mathematics and Science Education, University of Zambia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Mathematics teachers’ ability to translate and make connections between representations of functions requires investigation. Consequently, this qualitative case study article focuses on pre-service mathematics teachers’ nature of understanding of the tangent function; a function bearing unique characteristics compared with the sine and cosine functions. Twenty-two finalist pre-service teachers were conveniently selected and assessed concerning the ability to translate a tangent function to the graphical representation. Likewise, participants’ abilities to correctly explain this function and provide appropriate justifications for espoused perspectives were investigated. Although the teachers learned higher mathematics, their assessment was school mathematics-based. Descriptive analyses showed that only one teacher (5%) accurately completed the task. Eleven teachers (50%) did not provide graphs; suggesting a lack of knowledge required to change representation. Ten (45%) drew flawed graphs depicting a lack of understanding of discontinuity of the tangent function at certain angles and the role of a domain. Essentially, these demonstrated mere memorization of the appearance of the tangent graph. A purposive sub-sample of size six then participated in exploratory semi-structured interviews. The interviews allowed participants to elucidate their answers to the initial task. Content analysis of the transcripts corroborated the earlier finding as the interviewees could not coherently explain the tangent function, and failed to justify their reasoning. The teachers demonstrated a superficial understanding despite having studied advanced mathematics. This reinforces the view that studying advanced mathematics does not assure a relational understanding of school mathematics. Therefore, it is necessary for trainee teachers to explore school mathematics.

Keywords

Pre-service mathematics teachers, graphical representation, translation, compartmentalization, advanced mathematics, tangent function

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdulkadir, T. (2013). A conceptual analysis of the knowledge of prospective mathematics teachers about degree and radian. World Journal of Education, 3(4), 1. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov

Akkoc, H. (2008). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ concept images of radian. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 39(7), 857–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390802054458

Bair, S. L., & Rich, B. S. (2011). Characterizing the Development of Specialized Mathematical Content Knowledge for Teaching in Algebraic Reasoning and Number Theory. Mathematical Thinking & Learning, 13(4), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2011.608345

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554

Bromme, R. (1994). Beyond subject matter: A psychological topology of teachers’ professional knowledge. In R. Biehler, Scholz, W. R., StraBer, R., &Winkelmann, B. (Ed.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 73-88). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Cooney, T. J. &Wiegel, H.G. (2003).Examining the mathematics in mathematics teacher education. In A. J. C. M. A. K. Bishop, C; Kilpatrick, J and Leung, F.K.S (Ed.), Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 795). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourth ed.). United States of America: Pearson Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Examinations Council of Zambia (2016).2015 Examination Performance Review Report for Natural Sciences. Lusaka: Examination Council of Zambia.

Fennema, E., &Franke, M. L. (1992).Teachers' knowledge and its impact.In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning (pp. 147-164). New York: McMillan Publishing Company.

Gerson, H. (2010). David’s Understanding of Functions and Periodicity.School Science and Mathematics.108(1), 28-38. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net

Grouws, D. & Schultz, K. (1996). Mathematics Teacher Education: In Sikula, J. (Ed) Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, 2nd edition (USA: Macmillan).

Malambo, P. (2016). Exploring Zambian Mathematics Student teachers’ content knowledge of functions and trigonometry for secondary schools (University of Pretoria).Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52943.

Malambo, P., van Putten, S., Botha, H., Stols, G. (2018). Mathematics Student Teachers' Understanding of Trigonometry for Secondary Schools. Nov 201811th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Spain.Retrieved from https://library.iated.org.

Malambo, P., van Putten, S., Botha, H., Stols, G. (2019). Dysfunctional Functions: The Case of Zambian Mathematics Education Students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), em1651. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99510

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative Research A Guide to Design and Implementation (Second ed.). San Francisco, CA 94103-1741: Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education. (2013a). “O” Level Mathematics Syllabus (Grades 10 to 12) Lusaka, Zambia.: Zambia Curriculum Development Centre.

Ministry of Education. (2013b). Zambia Education Curriculum Framework. Lusaka: Zambia Curriculum Development Centre.

Nyikahadzoyi, M. R. (2015). Teachers’ Knowledge of the concept of a function: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9486-9

Ogbonnaya, U. I., & Mogari, D. (2014). The Relationship Between Grade 11 Students’ Achievement in Trigonometric Functions and Their Teachers’ Content Knowledge. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 443. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org

Shulman, L. (1986). Those whounderstand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/1175860

Skemp, R. (2006). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88-95.

Steele, M. D., Hillen, A. F., & Smith, M. S. (2013). Developing mathematical knowledge for teaching in a methods course: the case of function.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(6), 451-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-013-9243-6

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 362 time(s)
PDF: 232 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.