Promoting creative thinking for gifted students in undergraduate mathematics

Parinya Sa Ngiamsunthorn(1*)

(1) Department of Mathematics, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Gifted students need a form of special education through extracurricular and learning experiences because they have extraordinary potential in terms of intelligence, creativity, social and mentality, compared to other students. This study aims to investigate various teaching and learning approaches designed for gifted students, and to constitute appropriate techniques that enhance their creative thinking in mathematics. The participants of this study were first-year gifted students enrolled in fundamental mathematics courses towards their undergraduate engineering programs at a science and technology-based university in Thailand. This study discovered that an adequate use of challenge-based learning, problem solving process, project-based learning, well-designed questions and in-depth learning style in the classroom effectively fostered their insightful and creative thought. Moreover, an online tool such as Facebook could be used as a learning platform outside the classroom to engage them in online discussion and collaboration and to challenge their thinking. Ultimately, based on students’ feedbacks and evaluation, this study found that a combination of these techniques and methods built up a more comfortable and motivating atmosphere that helped them for creative thinking and corresponded to their needs and satisfaction.

Keywords

Gifted students, creative thinking, mathematics, techniques and methods

Full Text:

PDF

References

Burney, V.(2008). Indiana mandate for high-ability identification and services signed by Governor Daniels: Record funding for high-ability students. , 31(1), 50. Gifted Child Today, 31(1), 50–51. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/openview/5b62c2ae9a40083b49e2fad55efc4bb4/1?cbl=46372&pq-origsite=gscholar

Clarke, L., & Bana, J. (2001). Phantom classmates: A case study of talented mathematics students learning via telematics. In & M. M. (Eds) In J. Bobis, B. Perry (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from https://ro.ecu.edu.au/ecuworks/4900/

Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (2002). Handbook of Gifted Education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Press.

Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2000). An enrichment philosophy and strategy for empowering young gifted children to become autonomous learners in science. Gifted and Talented International, 15(1), 16–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2000.11672925

Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2002). The Importance of Challenging Tasks for Mathematically Gifted Students. Gifted and Talented International, 17(2), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2002.11672991

Fraser-Seeto, K., Howard, S. J., & Woodcock, S. (2013). Preparation for teaching gifted students: An updated investigation into university offerings in New South Wales. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 22(2), 45. Retrieved from https://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1604&context=sspapers

Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and Talent: Reexamining a Reexamination of the Definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302

Gagné, Françoys, & Gagnier, N. (2004). The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26(3), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190409554258

Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ Negative Affect Toward Academically Gifted Students: An Evolutionary Psychological Study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319704

Khalil, M., & Accariya, Z. (2016). Identifying “Good” Teachers for Gifted Students. Creative Education, 7, 407–418. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.73040

Koshy, V. (2001). Teaching Mathematics to Able Children.London: David Fulton Publishers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203065198

Landvogt, J. (2001). Affecting eternity: Teaching for talent development. Roeper Review, 23(4), 190–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190109554097

Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Gifted: The Importance of Professional Development and School Culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42. Retrieved from search.informit.com.au/documentSummary ;dn=985113224788269;res=IELHSS%3E ISSN: 1323-9686

Leikin, R. (2011). The education of mathematically gifted students: Some complexities and questions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1). Retrieved from scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol8/iss1/9

McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What Predicts Teachers’ Attitudes Toward the Gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207302719

Milgram, R. M. (1979). Perception of teacher behavior in gifted and nongifted children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.1.125

Nevo, B., & Rachmel, S. (2009). Education of Gifted Children: A General Roadmap and the Case of Israel. In Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (R. Leikin,). Retrieved from https://edu.gov.il/owlHeb/GanaiYeladim/ Oclusiyotyechudiyot/Mechunanim/Documents/gifted1.pdf

Plunkett, D. M., & Kronborg, D. L. (2011). Learning to Be a Teacher of the Gifted: The Importance of Examining Opinions and Challenging Misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1–2), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2011.11673587

Plunkett, M. M. (2002). Impacting on Teacher Attitudes Toward Gifted Students.In W. Vialle, & J. Geake (Eds.). In Victoria (Ed.), The Gifted Enigma: A Collection of Articles (pp. 240–259). Retrieved from research.monash.edu/en/publications/impacting-on-teacher-attitudes-toward-gifted-students

Scott, P. (1998). Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: a Vygotskian Analysis and Review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269808560127

Shaywitz, S. E., Holahan, J. M., Freudenheim, D. A., Fletcher, J. M., Makuch, R. W., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2001). Heterogeneity Within the Gifted: Higher IQ Boys Exhibit Behaviors Resembling Boys With Learning Disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500103

Taber, K. . (2008). Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science. Sci Ence and Education, 17(2–3), 179–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4

Taber, K. S. (2010). Challenging gifted learners: general principles for science educators; and exemplification in the context of teaching chemistry. Science Education International, 21(1), 5–30. Retrieved from //files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ890658.pdf

Tjoe, H. (2015). Giftedness and Aesthetics: Perspectives of Expert Mathematicians and Mathematically Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(3), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986215583872

Troxclair, D. A. (2013). Preservice teacher attitudes towards giftedness. Roeper Review, 35(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.740603

Vidergor, H., & Reiter, prof. S. (2008). Satisfaction with School among Gifted Israeli Students Studying in Various Frameworks. Gifted and Talented International, 23(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2008.11673511

Ziv, Y., & Sorongon, A. (2011). Social Information Processing in Preschool Children: Relations to Sociodemographic Risk and Problem Behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(4), 412–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.02.009

DOI: 10.23917/jramathedu.v5i1.9675

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1502 time(s)
PDF: 980 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.