Pengembangan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Matematika Kurikulum 2013 Berbasis Lesson Study Di SMP

Sutama Sutama(1*)

(1) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of research, describe and test the development of lesson plan Junior High School math curriculum-based lesson study in 2013. This type of research, namely research and development. The subject of research, math teachers, principals, and students from Junior High School 26 Salatiga, as well as education experts and policy makers. Methods of data collection, observation, interviews, documentation, testing, and questionnaires. Data were analyzed using qualitative analysis flow models, comparison, and t test. Result: the planning of the implementation of learning methods section, learning activities, and part of the cover varies greatly from one teacher to another. In the method of a teacher who wrote approach, learning strategies, and learning methods; but there is also a write down approach, a model of learning and teaching methods. The learning activities are structured in a math teacher lesson plan through three stages: preliminary activities, core activities, and closing activity. At each step of the variation of teacher is very diverse, but not pay attention to individual differences of students. At the closing, the teacher with students either individually or in groups do not reflect to evaluate the entire range of activities hereinafter find direct benefit aupun indirectly from the learning outcomes, provide feedback on the learning process and results, conduct follow-up activity in the form of duties , either individually or in groups, and inform future learning plans.

Keywords

diverse, individual differences, reflection, variation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y. S. 2009. Handbook of Qualitative Research (Edisi Bahasa Indonesia). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., and Borg, W.R. 2003. Educational Research An Introduction. New York: Pearson Educational, Inc.

Hansson, A. 2010.”Instructional responsibility in mathematics education: modelling classroom teaching using Swedish data”. Educational Studies in Mathematics May 2010, vol. 7(5), 171–189.

Indarti, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika 2014: Peran Kemampuan Komunikasi dan Berpikir Kritis Matematis serta Kemandirian Belajar Siswa SMA Menggunakan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Sekolah Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Siliwangi Bandung: Program Pascasarjana Pendidikan Matematika.

Li, M. and Yu P. 2009. “Study on Effect of Mathematics Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge on Mathematics Teaching”. Journal of Mathematic Education, Juni 2009, Vol.2,No.1, 55-68.

Majid, A. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Martino, P. D. and Zan, R. 2009.”Me and maths’: towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives”.Journal of Mathematic Teacher Education, Vol. 5, No.13, 27-48.

Sutama. 2011. ”Pengelolaan Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Aptitude Treatment Interaction”, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar, Disampaikan pada Sidang Senat Terbuka UMS, Sabtu, 8 Januari 2011.

Sutama. 2012. ”Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, R&D). Surakarta: Fairuz Media.

Sutama, Narimo, S., dan Haryoto. 2013. “Contextual Math Learning Based on Lesson Study Can Increase Study Communication”. International Journal of Education. Vol. 5, No. 4, 48-60.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 207 time(s)
PDF: 462 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.