Economic Valuation of Mangrove Restoration in Indonesia

Djoko Suprapto(1*), Mayanggita Kirana(2), Indah Susilowati(3), Akhmad Fauzi(4)

(1) Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, Diponegoro University
(2) Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University
(3) Faculty of Economics and Business, Diponegoro University
(4) Department of Resource Economics, Bogor Agricultural University
(*) Corresponding Author


Mangrove forest is one of the important ecosystems in Karimunjawa, Indonesia. It provides a variety of services both ecologically and economically. However, over-exploited activity, such as timber theft, can be threatening the sustainability of mangrove forest in Karimunjawa now and in the future. Thus, the improved management for mangrove forest is necessary to ensure its sustainability, and it is depending on how people value the conservation from economic and environment consideration. This study examines the factors influencing on the willingness to pay (WTP) of respondents for mangrove restoration in Karimunjawa. A total of 502 respondents were interviewed using census method. The method employed is Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)Single Bounded. In CVM, the logit model was defined based on dichotomous choice method to estimate the willingness-to-pay (WTP) randomly with three different starting bid value. Findings showed that local awareness of the importance of the values given by mangroves was popularized among local communities. The findings also indicated that respondents who are higher education and have more income were more likely to pay for the mangrove restoration.


economic-valuation; mangrove; Karimunjawa; Indonesia

Full Text:



Abdullah, Mukrimah, Mohd Parid Mamat, Mohd Rusli Yaacob, Alias Radam, Lim Hin Fui. 2015. Estimate the conservation value of biodiversity in national heritage site: a case of forest research institute. Procedia Environmental Sciences. Vol 30, (180–185)

Amirnejad, H Khalilian, S, Assarch, M, H, Ahmadian, M. 2006. Estimating the existence value of north forest of Iran by using a Contingent Valuation Method. Ecological Economics. 58 (4) 665-675.

Bateman I. and R. Turner. 2002. Evaluation of environment: the contingent valuation method, CSERGE Working Paper GEC 92-18.

Becker, N. Choresh Y, Inbar M, Bahat.O. 1998. Combining TCm and CVM of endangered species conservation programme: Esti mation of the Marginal Value of Vultures in the presence of species visitors interaction, Biodiversity Economics, 313-342.

Bishop RC and Heberlein. 1989. The Contingent Valuation Method in economic valuation of natural resources. Land Economics 68(4): 405-417.

BTNKJ. 2014. Laporan Tahunan Balai Taman Nasional Karimunjawa 2013. Kementerian Kehutanan, Direktorat Jenderal Perlindungan Hutan dan Konservasi Alam.

Campbell, S. J., Hoey A. S., Maynard J., Kartawijaya T., and Cinner J. 2012. Weak compliance undermines the success of no-take zones in a large government Controlled MPA. PLoS ONE Vol. 7 (11): e50074. doi:10.1371/journl.pone.0050074.

Chea, Chiam Chooi. 2013. The Benefits of Conserving Living Heritage in Melaka City, Melaka. Dissertation. Economic Faculty of University Putra Malaysia.

Choi, A, Brent W. Ritchie, Franco Papandera, Jeff Bennett. 2009. Economic valuation of cultural heritage: a choice modeling approach. Elsevier.

Ciriacy, Wantrup, C.V., 1968. Resource Conservation: Economics and Policies. University of California, Berkeley.

Datta, Debajit, Chattopadhyay, R.N., Guha, P. 2012. Community Based Mangrove Management: a Review on Status and Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Management. Vol. 107,84-95.

Davis, R. 1963. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Natural Resources Journal, 3 (2), 239-249.

Ellison, A.M. 2000. Mangrove Restoration: Do We Know Enough? Restoration Ecology 8(3):219–29.

Food Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2007. The World’s Mangroves 1980e2005: A Thematic Study Prepared

In the Framework of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005. FAO Forestry Paper 153, Food and Agriculture Organization of the united nations, Roma, Italy.

Giraud, K.L., Loomis, J.B., and Cooper, J.C. 2001. A Comparison of Willingness to Pay Estimation Techniques from Referendum Questions. Environmental and Resource Economics 20: 331–346.

Hammitt, James, Jin-Tan Liu, and Jin-Long Liu. 2001. Contingent Valuation of A Taiwanese Wetland. Environment and Development Economics Journal. Vol. 6, pp. 259-268.

Hanley, N. and Spash C.L. 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited

Mitchell R.C, Carson R.T. 1989. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the future. Washington DC.

Pearce D.W and Turner R.K. 1990. Economics of Natural Resources and The Environment. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp.378.

Sakonnakon S.PN, Hirunsalee S, Kanegae H, Denpaiboon C. 2012. Valuing externalities from water supply: choice complexity and individual random effect in panel kernel logit analysis. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4): 449-456

Stone, Kathy, Mahadev Bhat Ramachandra Bhatta and Andrew Mathews. 2008. Factors Influencing Community Participation in Mangrove Restoration: A Contingent Valuation Analysis. Ocean and Coastal Management, Vol. 51, pp. 476-484.

Susanto, Hary, Imam Taufiquraarhman, and S. Van Balen. 2014. Waders of Karimunjawa National Park, Central Java, Indonesia. Stilt. Vol. 66, Page 1-9.

Throsby, D. 2003. Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How Much does Contingent Valuation Tell Us? Journal of Cultural Economics Vol. 27(3): 275-285.

Tuan, Tran Huu, Nguyen Hoang Diem Mym Le Thi Quinh Anh, dan Nguyen Van Toan. 2014. Factors Influencing Community Participation in Mangrove Restoration: A Contingent Valuation Analysis. Ocean

and Coastal Management Journal, Vol. 95, pp. 198-212.

Venkatachalam, L. 2003. Designing Contingent Valuation (CV) Surveys for Estimating Use Values: Some Experience from Case Study of a Water Supply Project. Journal of Social and Economic Development, Vol.

(2): 267-284.

Vo,Quoc Tuan, C.Kuenzer, Quang Minh Vo, F. Moder, N. Oppelt. 2012. Review of valuation methods for mangrove ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators Vol 23, 431-446.

Wegner, G., Pascual, U., 2011. Cost-benefit analysis of ecosystem services for human well-being: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change 21 (2), 492–504

Whitten, T., R.E. Soeriaatmadja, and S.A. Afiff. 2000. The Ecology of Java and Bali. Singapore: Periplus.

Yacob, M.R, Radam A., and Shuib A. 2008. Economic valuation of Marine Parks Ecotourism Malaysia: Redang Island Marine Park. University Putra Malaysia Press.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 2560 time(s)
PDF: 1316 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.