Surakarta Creative Economy Development Model As an Effort to Create New Economic Resources

SP Nugroho(1*), Ihwan Susila(2), Anton Agus Setyawan(3)

(1) Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(2) Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(3) Univ. Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

As a center of creative economy, Surakarta City has cultural diversity and creative people. This is reflected by the availability of resources and creative products in each sub-district to be further developed. The development of the creative economy of Surakarta will address the challenges of future economic development including increasing economic growth, reducing poverty, creating new jobs, and industrial competitiveness. This study aims to develop an integrated model of each stakeholder coordinated by the Regional Device Organization (RDO) in Surakarta government to support the implementation of the development of the national creative economy. The Surakarta creative economy development model refers to the 5 pillars of the development of the national creative economy. This development model has a relationship between the foundations and pillars of development, planning activities supported by stakeholders (academics, business, government, and communities), as well as markets for creative products. RDO programs and activities are prepared based on the pillars of creative economic development that are in line with the tasks and functions. The Department of Education focuses on programs and activities on the pillars of resources, creating creative people at the basic level through the school curriculum. The Department of Cooperative and MSME focuses on the pillars of resource development through training and business network development, as well as financial intermediation. Department of Industry and Labor focus on developing resources and institutions. The Department of Tourism and Culture focuses on industrial pillars. The Department of Trading focuses on industrial pillars.

Keywords

creative economy, pillars of creative economy, models, development

Full Text:

PDF

References

Atkinson, R., & Easthope, H. (2009). The consequences of the creative class: The pursuit of creativity strategies in Australia's cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 64-79.

Benneworth, P. (2004). In what sense ‘regional development?’: Entrepreneurship, underdevelopment and strong tradition in the periphery. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16(6), 439-458.

Borseková, K., & Vaňová, A. (2011). Competitive Advantage of Slovak Republic. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Thought, 1(4), 237-257.

Florida, R. (2005). Cities and the creative class. Routledge.

Gibson, C. R., & Freestone, R. (2006). The cultural dimension of urban planning strategies: an historical perspective.

Ginevičius, R., & Čirba, S. (2009). Additive measurement of market concentration. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(3), 191-198.

Ginevičius, R., & Krivka, A. (2009). Multicriteria evaluation of the competitive environment in the oligopolic market. Business: Theory and Practice, 10, 247.

Hornby, A. S., & Parnwell, E. C. (1969). An English-reader's dictionary. Oxford University Press.

Howkins, J. (2009). The creative ecology. St. Lucia: UQP.

Karnitis, E. (2006). A knowledge‐based human‐centred growth model for Latvia. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 7(3), 95-101.

Mardikanto, T. (2009). Sistem penyuluhan pertanian. Diterbitkan atas Kerja sama Lembaga Pengembangan Pendidikan (LPP) dan UPT Penerbitan dan Pencetakan UNS (UNS Press), Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Melnikas, B. (2010). Sustainable development and creation of the knowledge economy: the new theoretical approach. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(3), 516-540.

Monclús, F. J., & i Bassols, M. G. (Eds.). (2006). Culture, urbanism and planning. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd..

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 39 Tahun 2006.

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 72 Tahun 2015 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2015 Tentang Badan Ekonomi Kreatif.

Scott, A. J. (2006). Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of urban affairs, 28(1), 1-17.

Soumelis, C. (1983). Future educational policy preoccupations and the role of educational planning. OECD Educational Planning: a reappraisal.

Strazdas, R. (2006). Methodical aspects of innovation costs calculation system. Business: Theory and Practice, 7, 89.

Sutjipta, I. N. (2009). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Universitas Udayana.(Diktat).

Verwijnen, J., & Lehtovuori, P. (Eds.). (1999). Creative cities: cultural industries, urban development and the information society. University of Art and Design Helsinki.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 786 time(s)
PDF: 545 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.