Strengthening STEAM Learning Implementation: Exploring Indonesian Teacher Experts' Perspectives with Pedagogical Guidelines Using the Delphi Method
Pasttita Ayu Laksmiwati(1*), Zsolt Lavicza(2), Adi Nur Cahyono(3)(1) Linz School of Education, Johannes Kepler University
(2) Linz School of Education, Johannes Kepler University
(3) Department of Mathematics, Universitas Negeri Semarang
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Implemen-tation of engineering design process in the K-12 science classrooms: Trends and issues. Research in Science Edu-cation, 52(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A Place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Educa-tion, 65(2), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2012.11519167
Brakoniecki, A., Ward, M., & Fougere, G. (2016). Using the engineering design process to complement the teaching and learning of mathematics. 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposi-tion Proceedings, 27167. https://doi.org/10.18260/p.27167
Bush, S. B., & Cook, K. L. (2019). Structur-ing STEAM inquiries: Lessons learned from practice. In M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM Edu-cation: Theory and Practice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1
Cobb, P. (1988). The Tension between theo-ries of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_2
El Bedewy, S., Lavicza, Z., Haas, B., & Lie-ban, D. (2021). A STEAM practice approach to integrate architecture, cul-ture and history to facilitate mathe-matical problem-solving. Education Sciences, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010009
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. Inter-national Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3, s40594-016-0036–1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM learning through engineering design: Fourth-grade students’ investigations in aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7
Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM education implementa-tion in Indonesia: A Scoping review. International Journal of STEM Educa-tion for Sustainability, 1(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2
Furtak, E. M. (2017). Confronting dilemmas posed by three‐dimensional classroom assessment: Introduction to a virtual issue of Science Education. Science Education, 101(5), 854–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21283
Han, H.-J., & Shim, K.-C. (2019). Develop-ment of an engineering design process-based teaching and learning model for scientifically gifted students at the Science Education Institute for the Gifted in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0047-6
Harju-Luukkainen, H., & Vettenranta, J. (2013). The Influence of local culture on students’ educational outcomes. In K. Tirri & E. Kuusisto (Eds.), Interac-tion in Educational Domains (pp. 77–90). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-395-9_7
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique: Delphi sur-vey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
Holmes, K., Mackenzie, E., Berger, N., & Walker, M. (2021). Linking K-12 STEM pedagogy to local contexts: A Scoping review of benefits and limita-tions. Frontiers in Education, 6, 693808. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.693808
Hynes, M. M. (2012). Middle-school teach-ers’ understanding and teaching of the engineering design process: A look at subject matter and pedagogical con-tent knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9142-4
Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-oriented conceptual framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z
Janssen, F. J. J. M., Tigelaar, D. E. H., & Verloop, N. (2009). Developing Biol-ogy lessons aimed at teaching for un-derstanding: A Domain-specific heu-ristic for student teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-008-9118-3
Jolly, A. (2017). STEM By Design Strategies and Activities for Grade 4-8. Routledge.
Jünger, S., Payne, S. A., Brine, J., Radbruch, L., & Brearley, S. G. (2017). Guidance on conducting and reporting delphi studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a method-ological systematic review. Palliative Medicine, 31(8), 684–706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690685
Kalaian, S., & Kasim, R. M. (2012). Termi-nating Sequential Delphi Survey Data Collection. https://doi.org/10.7275/G48Q-JE05
Kim, H., & Chae, D. (2016). The develop-ment and application of a STEAM program based on traditional Korean culture. EURASIA Journal of Mathe-matics, Science and Technology Edu-cation, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1539a
King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. Amer-ican Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312032003465
Laksmiwati, P. A., Lavicza, Z., Cahyono, A. N., Yunianto, W., & Houghton, T. (2023). Unveiling the implementation of STE(A)M education: An Explorato-ry case study of Indonesia from ex-perts’ and policymakers’ perspectives. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2267959. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2267959
Laksmiwati, P.A., Lavicza, Z., Nur Cahyono, A., Alagic, M., & Mumcu, F. (2024). When Engineering Design Meets STEAM in Hybrid Learning: Teachers’ innovation key through design heuris-tics. Manuscript submitted for publica-tion.
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., Eng-lish, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and design thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Educa-tion Research, 2(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00020-z
Liao, C. (2019). Creating a STEAM map: A Content analysis of visual art prac-tices in STEAM education. In M. S. Khine & S. Areepattamannil (Eds.), STEAM Education: Theory and Prac-tice. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1
McKenney, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2019). Conducting educational design re-search (Second edition). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Mengual-Andrés, S., Roig-Vila, R., & Mira, J. B. (2016). Delphi study for the de-sign and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y
Moore, K. D. (2015). Effective instructional strategies: From theory to practice. Sage Publications.
Morris, J., Slater, E., Fitzgerald, M. T., Lummis, G. W., & Van Etten, E. (2021). Using local rural knowledge to enhance STEM Learning for gifted and talented students in Australia. Re-search in Science Education, 51(S1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9823-2
National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Educa-tion: Practices, Crosscutting Con-cepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Be-havioral and Social Sciences and Edu-cation. The National Academies Press.
Nieveen, N. (1999). Prototyping to reach product quality. In J. Van Den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Niev-een, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design Ap-proaches and Tools in Education and Training (pp. 125–135). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4255-7_10
Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, Jr., T. K., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identi-fying teacher expertise: An Examina-tion of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_2
Parker, F., Novak, J., & Bartell, T. (2017). To engage students, give them mean-ingful choices in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(2), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721717734188
Perry, R. R., & Lewis, C. C. (2009). What is successful adaptation of lesson study in the US? Journal of Educational Change, 10(4), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9069-7
Prahmana, R. C. I., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2020). Learning geometry and values from patterns: Ethnomathematics on the batik patterns of yogyakarta, indo-nesia. Journal on Mathematics Educa-tion, 11(3), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12949.439-456
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual mod-el of STEAM teaching practices: De-veloping a conceptual model. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12201
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., King, E., & Plank, H. (2020). STEAM designed and en-acted: Understanding the process of design and implementation of STEAM curriculum in an elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09832-w
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., Shekell, C., Cian, H., & Jacques, L. (2019). Connected learning in STEAM classrooms: Op-portunities for engaging youth in sci-ence and math classrooms. Interna-tional Journal of Science and Mathe-matics Education, 18(8), 1441–1463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10034-z
Rusznyak, L., & Walton, E. (2011). Lesson planning guidelines for student teach-ers: A Scaffold for the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Edu-cation as Change, 15(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/16823206.2011.619141
Rye, S. A., & Støkken, A. M. (2012). The Implications of the Local Context in Global Online Education. 13(1), 16.
Schallert, S., Lavicza, Z., & Vandervieren, E. (2022). Towards Inquiry-based flipped classroom scenarios: A Design heuristic and principles for lesson planning. International Journal of Sci-ence and Mathematics Education, 20(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10167-0
Sevian, H., Dori, Y. J., & Parchmann, I. (2018). How does STEM context-based learning work: What we know and what we still do not know. Inter-national Journal of Science Education, 40(10), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1470346
Setyaningsih, E., Agustina, P., Anif, S., Ah-mad, C. N. C., Sofyan, I., Saputra, A., Salleh, W. N. W. M., Shodiq, D. E., Rahayu, S., & Hidayat, M. L. (2022). PBL-STEM Modul Feasibility Test for Preservice Biology Teacher. Indone-sian Journal on Learning and Ad-vanced Education (IJOLAE), 4(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.15980
Simarro, C., & Couso, D. (2021). Engineer-ing practices as a framework for STEM education: A Proposal based on epistemic nuances. International Jour-nal of STEM Education, 8(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00310-2
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing math-ematics pedagogy from a constructiv-ist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/749205
Singh, M. (2021). Acquisition of 21st centu-ry skills through STEAM education. Academia Letters, Article 712. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL712
Spyropoulou, C., Wallace, M., Vassilakis, C., & Poulopoulos, V. (2020). Examin-ing the use of STEAM education in preschool education. European Jour-nal of Engineering Research and Sci-ence, 6.
Staker, H. (2011). The Rise of K–12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED535181
Sumarni, W., Sudarmin, S., Sumarti, S. S., & Kadarwati, S. (2022). Indigenous knowledge of Indonesian traditional medicines in science teaching and learning using a science–technology–engineering–mathematics (STEM) ap-proach. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17(2), 467–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10067-3
Syahmani, S., Hafizah, E., Sauqina, S., Adnan, M. Bin, & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). STEAM Approach to Improve Environmental Education Innovation and Literacy in Waste Management: Bibliometric Research. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.12782
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A Decade of research. Ed-ucational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (Eds.). (2006). Educational design research. Routledge.
Vasquez, J. A., Sneider, C., & Comer, M. (2013). STEM lesson essentials, grades 3-8: Integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Heinemann.
Webb, M. M. (2006). What Does It Mean To Preservice Mathematics Teachers To Anticipate Student Responses? [Brigham Young University]. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/1122
Zamjani, I., Rakhmah W., D. N., Azizah, S. N., Waruwu, H., & Hariyanti, E. (2020). Platform pembelajaran digital dan strategi inklusivitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidi-kan dan Kebudayaan.
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 47 time(s)PDF: 29 time(s)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.