Genetic Literacy for Students in Faculties of Education in Universities

Ali Raheem Mohammed(1*), Raheemah Rwayyih Habeeb(2), Nibal Abbas Hadi Al-Muhja(3)

(1) University of Al-Qadisiyah
(2) Minstry of Education in Adewaniyah
(3) University of Al-Qadisiyah
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Genetic literacy is the capacity to obtain, process, understand, and use genetic information. It is highly imperative in life science students; the current study was conducted to assess genetic literacy in students. The goals of the current project are (1) to assess the Genetic Literacy of life sciences students in education colleges, and (2) to identify how Genetic Literacy changes according to variables of academic level, gender, and different universities in education students in universities of the Furat Al-Awsat. To achieve the project's goals, the two researchers used the analytical-descriptive method using the steps such as an examination prepared to assess the impact of the variables of interest. Experts then reviewed it to confirm its legitimacy, clarity, and suitability to the target audience. The testing timing was then inferred using a trial on a sample consisting of 40 students that belong to the target audience. The test was then applied to a sample of 395 students in the second semester of the academic year 2020-2021. The sample was randomly selected from the universities of Al-Qādisiyyah, Karbala, and Kufa. The statistical packages, SPSS-26, and Microsoft tool, Microsoft Excel, were used to process the collected data and show that education-department students of the selected universities did not possess Genetic Literacy. Varying gender did not have a statistically clear impact on Genetic Literacy. Differences in genetic literacy were identified between 3rd and 4th-level students and their 1st and 2nd counterparts. The researchers concluded the necessity of integration among the contents of education and genetic literacy applied to the size, type, and quality of the material and activities in the curriculum. They also suggested that further studies must be made to study the relationship between students' level of genetic literacy and that of educators.

Keywords

Literacy; Genetic Literacy; Students in Faculties of Education

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abed, I. H. (2016). Content Evaluation of the Book (Principles of Science) for the Fourth Primary Class According to Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). Basic Education College Magazine For Educational and Humanities Sciences(26).

Al-Khattat, S. H. K., Al-Muhja, N. A. H., & Mohammed, A. R. (2019). Ecological Awareness for Training-Teachers at Chemistry and Biology Departments and its Correlate with them Academic Achievement. Transylvanian Review, 1(9).

Allison, C., Miller, A., Oliver, I., Michaelson, R., & Tiropanis, T. (2012). The Web in education. Computer Networks, 56(18), 3811-3824.

Alzamili, R. A. J., & Mohammed, F. H. (2019). Organizational Commitment to Preparatory Stage Teachers. psihologija, 52(5).

Alzamili, R. A. J., & Mohammed, F. H. (2020). Ethical Leadership and its Relationship to the Occupational Competency of University Staff. psihologija, 52(6).

Barreiro, P. L., & Albandoz, J. P. (2001). Population and sample. Sampling techniques. Management mathematics for European schools, 1(1), 1-18.

Black, E. W., Dickson, T., & Blue, A. V. (2021). Exploring item discrimination in an online self and peer assessment of interprofessional teamwork. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 22, 100396.

Boerwinkel, D. J., Yarden, A., & Waarlo, A. J. (2017). Reaching a consensus on the definition of genetic literacy that is required from a twenty-first-century citizen. Science & Education, 26(10), 1087-1114.

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1972). Essentials of educational measurement.

Edey, M. A., & Donald, C. (1994). Books to Help Teachers Achieve Science Literacy Ann Cwiklinski, Beth Czapla, & Luli Stern September 1996 ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education DIGEST. Striving for Excellence: The National Education Goals, 3, 113.

Gipps, C. V., & Murphy, P. (1994). A fair test? Assessment, achievement and equity: Open University Press.

Jennings, B. (2004). Genetic literacy and citizenship: possibilities for deliberative democratic policymaking in science and medicine. The Good Society, 13(1), 38-44.

Kaye, C., & Korf, B. (2013). Genetic literacy and competency. Pediatrics, 132(Supplement 3), S224-S230.

Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science education, 84(1), 71-94.

Maarschalk, J. (1986). Scientific literacy through informal science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 8(4), 353-360.

Mohammed, A. R. (2017). Perceived Teaching Self-Efficacy for Training-Teachers in Biological Departments and its Relationship with their Achievement. Basic Education College Magazine For Educational and Humanities Sciences (35), 571-583.

Mohammed, A. R., & Abd Oun, Z. Y. (2020). The Effect of Task-Based Learning Strategy on the Achievement and Moral Competence on the Ecology and Pollution text book for Biology Department. Indian Journal of Public Health, 11(02), 2111.

Muller, J. (2012). Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum and education policy: Routledge.

Reckase, M. D. (1985). The difficulty of test items that measure more than one ability. Applied psychological measurement, 9(4), 401-412.

Riojas‐Cortez, M., Huerta, M. E., Flores, B. B., Perez, B., & Clark, E. R. (2008). Using cultural tools to develop scientific literacy of young Mexican American preschoolers. Early Child Development and Care, 178(5), 527-536.

Roberts, D. A. (2013). Scientific literacy/science literacy Handbook of research on science education (pp. 743-794): Routledge.

Roberts, P., & Priest, H. (2006). Reliability and validity in research. Nursing standard, 20(44), 41-46.

Samerski, S. (2014). Genetic Literacy New Frontiers in Technological Literacy (pp. 165-172): Springer.

Silawati, E., & Mulyati, T. (2021). Developing Integrated Program To Empower Society In Supporting Children’s Literacy Practices: An Overview From A Village In Indonesia. Jurnal Varidika, 33(1), 1-10.

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement.

Turney, J. (2017). Signs of life–taking genetic literacy seriously Genetic imaginations: Ethical, legal and social issues in human genome research (pp. 131-140): Routledge.

van de Watering, G., & van der Rijt, J. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ perceptions of assessments: A review and a study into the ability and accuracy of estimating the difficulty levels of assessment items. Educational Research Review, 1(2), 133-147.

Vincent, D. (2003). Literacy literacy. Interchange, 34(2), 341-357.

Wrisley, D. M., Marchetti, G. F., Kuharsky, D. K., & Whitney, S. L. (2004). Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Physical therapy, 84(10), 906-918.

Zimmerman, D. W. (1972). Test reliability and the Kuder-Richardson formulas: Derivation from probability theory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32(4), 939-954.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 480 time(s)
PDF: 156 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.