Pengelolaan Program Induksi Guru Pemula (Pigp) Di SMP Negeri 3 Kunduran Blora
S Sugiyarti(1*), Bambang Sumardjoko(2)(1) 
(2) Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Algozzine, Bob. 2007. Beginning Teacher’s perseftions of their Induction Program Experience.
The clearing House. Vol.80.(3): 137-143
Dirjen peningkatan mutu PTK kementerian pendidikan nasional. 2010. Modul Program
Induksi Guru Pemula (PIGP) bagi guru pembimbing. Jakarta : Dirjen Peningkatan mutu
pendidik dan tenaga pendidikan kementerian pendidikan Nasional.
Depdiknas Dirjen Dikdas, 2003, Guru di Indonesia. Pendidikan, pelatihan dan perjuangan
sejak zaman kolonial hinga era reformasi. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional
Dirjen Dikdas Direktoral tenaga pendidikan.
Fraenkel and Wallen. 2015. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, ninth edition.
New York: McGraw-Hill International Edition.
Furqon, M. 2010. Guru Sejati Membangun insan berkarakter kuat dan cerdas. Surakarta:
Yuma pustaka
Ghony, MD dan Al Manshur, F. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jokjakarta: Ar-Ruz
Media.
Hallam,P.,dkk. 2012. Two Contrasting Models for Mentoring as They Affect Retention of
Beginning Teachers. National Association of Secondary Schoo l Principals. NASSP
Bulletin. Vol.96.(3): 243-278
Hellsten, L M. 2009. Teacher Induction: Exploring Beginning Teacher Mentorship. Canadian
Journal of Education. Vol. 32.(4): 703-733
Hobson, A J. 2013. Judgementoring and other threats to realizing the potential of school-based
mentoring in teacher education. Maderez Anggi.International Journal or mentoring Coachng in Education. Vol.2.(2): 89-108
Junaedi.M. 2015. Tesis Kontribusi Program Induksi Guru Pemula, Kompetensi Pedagogis
dan Lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja Guru Pemula di Kabupaten Klaten. UMS: Tesis
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Langdon, F; Ward, L. 2015. Educative mentoring: a way forward. International Journal of
Mentoring and Coaching in EducationVol.4.(4) : 240-254.
Liliana, E. 2014. The process of induction in a coaching version: The 10th International
Scientific Confernce and sofware for education Bucharest. Vol. 10.(24): 154-167
Mary C. 2000 . Making time for teacher induction : A lesson fron the New Zealand model, The
Clearing HouseVol.73.(6 ): 319-330.
Maya, I; Kamman, ML; McCray, E. 2014. Profesional Assistance, Emotional Suport, and
evaluation. Exceptional ChildrenVol. 81.(1) : 45-63.
Moir, E. 2009. Acceleting teacher effetiveness: Lessons Learned from Two Decade of New
Teacher Induction. Phi Delta Kappan. Vol.91.(2): 14-19
Moleong, LJ. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Pirkle, SF. 2011. Stemming the Tide: Retaining and Supporting Science Teachers.
Science EducatorVol.20.(2) : 42-46.
Priyambodo, RH. 2010. 1,3 guru belum
Article Metrics
Abstract view(s): 1231 time(s)PDF: 1554 time(s)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.