Students’ Responses Leveling in Solving Mathematical Problem Based on SOLO Taxonomy Viewed from Multiple Intelligences

Amalia Silwana(1*), Subanji Subanji(2), Muhamatsakree Manyunu(3), Arifah Adlina Rashahan(4)

(1) Universitas Negeri Malang
(2) Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Fathoni University
(4) Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This research aimed to determine the level of student response with logical-mathematical, verbal-linguistic, and visual-spatial intelligence tendency in solving mathematical problems of linear programming material based on SOLO taxonomy. The level of students’ responses as the output in this research is expected to be used as a reference by mathematics teachers to determine the appropriate learning methods and strategies in accordance with the tendency of students' multiple intelligence types. It can be useful in realizing the effectiveness of mathematics learning about what needs to improved and emphasized in learning so that all students can achieve optimal responses in solving mathematical problem and can develop their multiple intelligences. This research is descriptive qualitative research with six students in the 11th Grade of SMAN 1 Gondanglegi as research subjects: two students with logical-mathematical intelligence tendency, two students with verbal-linguistic intelligence tendency, and two students with visual-spatial intelligence tendency. Data collection was done by providing multiple intelligence classification tests, linear programming problem tests, and interviews. The result of the research showed the students’ response level in solving the mathematical problem of linear programming material based on SOLO taxonomy is that students with logical-mathematical intelligence tendency reached extended abstract response level, students with verbal-linguistic intelligence tendency reached multistructural response level, and students with visual-spatial intelligence tendency reached multistructural and relational response level.

Keywords

mathematical problem; multiple intelligences; response leveling; SOLO taxonomy

Full Text:

PDF

References

Afthina, H., & Pramudya, I. (2017). The Comparison of Think Talk Write and Think Pair Share Model with Realistic Mathematics Education Approach Viewed from Mathematical-Logical Intelligence. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Confe-rence Series, 2(1), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16706

Allan, B. A., & Shearer, B. (2012). The Scale for Existential Thinking. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 31(1), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.24972/ijts.2012.31.1.21

Aoyama, K. (2007). Investigating a Hierarchy of Student’s Interpretations of Graphs. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 2(3), 298–318.

Bhat, M. A. (2014). Effect of Problem Sol-ving Ability on the Achievement in Mathematics of High School Students. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 4(8), 685–688. https://doi.org/10.15373/2249555X/August2014/195

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evalua-ting the Quality of Learning: The SO-LO Taxonomy (Structure of The Ob-served Learning Outcome). Academic Press.

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching For Quality Learning at University Thrid es. McGraw-Hill and Open University Press.

Brabrand, C., & Dahl, B. (2008). Constructi-ve Alignment and the SOLO Taxono-my: A Comparative Study of Univer-sity Competences in Computer Science vs. Mathematics. Conference in Rese-arch and Practice in Information Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark.

Chick, H. (1998). Cognition in the formal modes: Research mathematics and the SOLO taxonomy. Mathematics Edu-cation Research Journal, 10(2), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217340

Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. (L. S. Lees, Trans.). Psychological Mo-nographs, 58(5), i–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599

Ekawati, R., Junaedi, I., & Nugroho, S. E. (2013). Studi Respon Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Ma-salah Matematika Berdasarkan Takso-nomi SOLO. Unnes Journal of Ma-thematics Education Research, 2(2), 101–107.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for The 21st Century. Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of Mind the The-ory of Multiple Intelligences. Basic Books.

Hasan, B. (2017). Karakteristik Respon Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 3(1), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v3i1.4282

Ilyas, S. N. (2019). Aplikasi Multiple Intelli-gences System (MIS) dalam Pembela-jaran Anak Usia Dini Studi Kasus di Rumah Sekolah Cendekia Makassar. PAUDIA : Jurnal Penelitian dalam Bidang Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 8(2), 50–56. https://doi.org/10.26877/paudia.v8i2.4882

Kuswana, W. S. (2014). Taksonomi Kognitif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Lian, L. H., & Idris, N. (2006). Assessing Algebraic Solving Ability of From Four Students. International Electro-nic Journal of Mathematics Educa-tion, 1(1), 55–76.

Lian, L. H., & Yew, W. T. (2012). Assessing Algebraic Solving Ability: A Theore-tical Framework. International Educa-tion Studies, 5(6), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p177

Lucas, U., & Mladenovic, R. (2009). The identification of variation in students’ understandings of disciplinary con-cepts: The application of the SOLO taxonomy within introductory accoun-ting. Journal for Higher Education, 58(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9218-9

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Third edition). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Mishra, S. K., & Ram, B. (2018). Introduc-tion to linear programming with MA-TLAB. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press.

Mulbar, U., Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Analysis Of The Ability In Mathematical Problem-solving Based on SOLO Taxonomy and Cognitive Style. World Transactions on Engine-ering and Technology Education, 15(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.26858/wtetev15i1y2017p6873

Novitasari, D. (2016). Pengaruh Penggunaan Multimedia Ineteraktif Terhadap Ke-mampuan Pemahaman Konsep Mate-matis Siswa. FIBONACCI: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matema-tika, 2(2), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.24853/fbc.2.2.8-18

Nugroho, R. A., Sutinah, & Setianingsih, R. (2013). Proses Berpikir Siswa dengan Kecerdasan Linguistik dan Logis Ma-tematis dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. MATHEdunesa Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 8.

Putri, U. H., Mardiyana, M., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2017). How to Analyze the Students’ Thinking Levels Based on SOLO Taxonomy?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012031

Rahbarnia, F., Hamedian, S., & Radmehr, F. (2014). A Study On The Relationship Between Multiple Intelligences and Mathematical Problem Solving Based on Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Jour-nal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics, 17(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720502.2013.842044

Salistiyani, Usodo, B., & Pramudya, I. (2016). Respon Siswa Dalam Meme-cahkan Masalah Matematika Pada Ma-teri Geometri Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO Ditinjau Dari Tingkat Meta-kognisi Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Cepu. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(9), 802–811.

Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman Procedure for Analyzing Primary Four Pupils Errors on Written Mathematical Tasks: A Malaysian Perspective. Procedia - So-cial and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036

Sudihartinih, E. (2019). Facilitating Mathema-tical Understanding In Three-Dimensional Geometry Using The SOLO Taxonomy. Erudio Journal of Educational Innovation, 6(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.18551/erudio.6-1.2

Sugiarto, E. C. (2019). Pembangunan Sum-ber Daya Manusia (SDM) Menuju Indonesia Unggul. https://www.setneg.go.id/baca/index/pembangunan_sumber_daya_manusia _sdm_menuju_indonesia_unggul

Sujarwo, A. (2013). Proses Berpikir Siswa SMK dengan Kecerdasan Linguistik, Logika Matematika, dan Visual Spasi-al dalam Memecahkan Masalah Ma-tematika. E-Jurnal Dinas Pendidikan Kota Surabaya, 3, 1–13.

Sulaiman, T., Abdurahman, A. R., & Rahim, S. S. A. (2010). Teaching Strategies Based on Multiple Intelligences The-ory among Science and Mathematics Secondary School Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.070

Wardani, N. K., Sutopo, & Pambudi, D. (2017). Profil Respons Siswa Berda-sarkan Taksonomi SOLO dalam Me-mecahkan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Pokok Lingkaran Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Pendi-dikan Matemtika dan Matematika (JPMM), 1(4), 91–107.

Yaumi, M. (2012). Pembelajaran Berbasis Multiple Intelligences. PT. Dian Rakyat.

Zulfairanatama, G., & Hadi, S. (2013). Kecer-dasan Logika-Matematika Berdasar-kan Multiple Intelligences terhadap Kemampuan Matematika Siswa SMP di Banjarmasin. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v1i1.549

DOI: 10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10528

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1909 time(s)
PDF: 1298 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.