WHICH TEAM ARE WE, LEAD TEACHER OR BOSS TEACHER? (AN INVESTIGATION OF IN-SERVICE TEACHERS’ THINKING AND DO TOWARD STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOR AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT)

Nuronia Cahyaningtyas; Nadia Asma’

doi:10.23917/humaniora.v21i1.8422

WHICH TEAM ARE WE, LEAD TEACHER OR BOSS TEACHER? (AN INVESTIGATION OF IN-SERVICE TEACHERS’ THINKING AND DO TOWARD STUDENTS’ BEHAVIOR AND CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT)

Nuronia Cahyaningtyas^(1*), Nadia Asma’⁽²⁾

(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Classroom management always be interesting issue to be discussed over years. It grows more interesting to be explored in its relation to the students’ behavior. By conducting a mini case study, the researchers obtained the data mainly by questionnaire and observations. The participant of this study is 23 in-service teachers who have a varied background and teaching experiences. The findings of this research show in detail how the teachers’ thinking toward the students’ behavior and their strategies to manage their classes. It is found out that the participants admitted that their students are mostly having disruptive behavior. However, the findings show that some of the teachers are able to have a proper strategy to deal with those behaviors; yet, they got difficulty to apply the strategies to the field. Conclusively, the obtained data also reveal which participant belongs to lead teacher and boss teacher.

Keywords

In-service teachers’ belief; Disruptive behavior; Classroom management

Full Text:

PDF

References

Armstrong, D. (2019). Addressing the wicked problem of behaviour in schools. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 1–17. doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1597183

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.

Clunies-Ross, P., Little, E., & Kienhuis, M. (2008). Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour. Educational Psychology, 28(6), 693–710. doi:10.1080/01443410802206700

Fauziati, E. (2017). Teaching English as a Foreign Language: Principle and Practice. Surakarta: Era Pustaka Utama.

Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of Research on Teacher Belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_

Kaplan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (2002). Classroom goal structure and student disruptive behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 191–211. doi:10.1348/000709902158847

Lanas, M., & Brunila, K. (2019). Bad behaviour in school: a discursive approach. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/01425692.2019.1581052

Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (Vol. 79). New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/329404

William, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yin, R. (2003). Case study Research Design and Methods. London: Sage Publication

DOI: 10.23917/humaniora.v21i1.8422