The Innovation and the Transformation of Indonesian Schools Accreditation Management System

Budi Susetyo(1*), Sylvia P. Soetantyo(2), Muhammad Sayuti(3), Darfiana Nur(4)

(1) Faculty of Mathematic and Science, IPB University, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, STKIP Muhammadiyah Bogor
(2) Faculty of Education, STAK Negeri Kupang
(3) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
(4) Faculty of Science and Engineering, Curtin University
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

All schools at the primary and secondary education levels in Indonesia must be accredited. An independent body called the National Accreditation Board for Schools/Madrasah (BAN-S/M) as an external quality assurance agency, accredits schools throughout Indonesia. Since 2005, the percentage of schools accredited in levels A and B has always increased from year to year based on the accreditation results. However, the improvement of school quality based on accreditation did not strongly correlate with the national exam and PISA results. This article discusses the facts of the experience of implementing accreditation for 15 years which became the basis for accreditation reform in Indonesia. BAN-S/M started the reformation in 2020 with three fundamental changes. First, the change in the accreditation instrument from compliance-based to performance-based. Second, the recruitment of new assessors based on cognitive competence and personality. Third, the changes of the accreditation business process through the dashboard monitoring system that will select schools with automatic accreditation extensions without visitation and schools that assessors must visit. implementation of Innovation and accreditation management reform can reduce accreditation costs by more than 60% and is expected to increase the accuracy of school quality assessment results. The findings strengthen the current transformation to the new, more efficient, rational  accreditiation management system for schools/madrasah.

Keywords

cognitive competence; dashboard monitoring system; educational accreditation management system; innovation management reform

Full Text:

PDF

References

Agustine, P. Y. (2019). Penerapan Random Forest Ordinal dalam Menentukan Mutu Penciri Akreditasi SMA Berdasarkan Indikator Pemetaan Mutu Pendidikan [Application of Ordinal Random Forest in Determining the Quality of High School Accreditation Characteristics Based on Education Quality Mapping Indicator]. Bachelor degree’s thesis. IPB University.

Ardiana, A.S, Indahwati, Susetyo, B (2019). Multivariate Random Forest to Identify the Importance Variable of 8 National Education Standards toward National Examination of Student High School in Indonesia. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR). Global Society of Scientific Research and Researchers (GSSRR). 48(6), 174-183.

Balitbang Kemendikbud. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2019). Laporan Kinerja Balitbang Kemendikbud Tahun 2019.

Balitbang dan Perbukuan Kemendikbud. Badan Penelitian Pengembangan dan perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2020. Laporan Kinerja Balitbang dan Perbukuan,Kemendikbud Tahun 2020.

BAN-S/M. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Sekolah/Madrasah. 2018. Pedoman Akreditasi Sekolah/Madrasah Tahun 2018.

BAN-S/M. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Sekolah/Madrasah. 2019. Pedoman Akreditasi Sekolah/Madrasah Tahun 2019.

BAN-S/M. Badan Akreditasi Nasional Sekolah/Madrasah. 2020. Pedoman Akreditasi Sekolah/Madrasah Tahun 2020.

Bialik, Maya & Fadel, Charles & Trilling, Bernie & Nilsson, Peter & Groff, Jennifer. (2015). Skills for the 21st Century: What Should Students Learn?.

Blanchin, M., & Hardouin, J.-B. a. (2011). Comparison of CTT and Rasch-based approaches for the analysis of longitudinal Patient Reported Outcomes. Statistics in medicine, 30(8), 825--838. doi:10.1002/sim.4153

Blind, Peride K. (2017). Accountability in Public Service Delivery: A Multidisciplinary Review of the Concept. Retrieved on http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/ documents/un-dpadm/ unpan046363.pdf.

Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.

Darling-Hammond, L & Adamson, F (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Duckworth, Angela. (2017. Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance. New York: Penguin Random House.

Evidiasari, S., Subanji, S., & Irawati, S. (2019). Students’ Spatial Reasoning in Solving Geometrical Transformation Problems. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 1(2), 38-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v1i2.8703.

Eyal, O., & Kark, R. (2004). How do transformational leaders transform organizations? A study of the relationship between leadership and entrepreneurship. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 3(3), 211–235

Fadhillah, A, F. (2019). Identifikasi Indikator Mutu Penciri Akreditasi Sekolah Jenjang SMP dengan Metode CART dan Regresi Logistik Ordinal [Identification of Quality Indicators for Middle School Accreditation with CART Method and Ordinal Logistics Regression]. Bachelor degree. IPB University.

Ferezagia, D.V., Susetyo, B., Indriyanto, B., & Pajajaran, J. (2015). Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) for National Education Standards (NES) of secondary school in Indonesia. Global Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 11(4), 2441–2449.

Gupta, V., et.al. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing andmeasuring a cross -cultural const ruct. Journal of Business Venturing19: 241–60

Hendarman (2013). Pemanfaatan Hasil Akreditasi dan Kredibilitas Asesor Sekolah/Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan [Utilization of Accreditation Results and Credibility of School/Madrasah Assessors. Journal of Education and Culture]. 19(4), 532-542.

Heywood, L.H. (2007). Principles-based accreditation. The way forward? MJA, 186(7), 31-32.

Hijrah, M., Susetyo, B., & Sartono, B. (2018). Structural equation modeling of national standard education of vocational high school using partial least square path modeling. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(4), 1418–1422.

Jan, H. (2017). Teacher of 21 st Century: Characteristics and Development. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. 7. 50-54.

Kuratko, D. (2007). Entrepreneurial Leadership in the 21st Century. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1-11.

Lase, R.L., Susetyo, B., Syafitri U. (2016). Application of Multivariate Exploration Analysis of the Vocational High School Accreditation Data in Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 7(12)

Leithwood, K & Day, C. (2008) The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes, School Leadership & Management: Formerly School Organisation, 28:1, 1-4, DOI: 10.1080/13632430701799718n

Lickona, Thomas. (2007). Educating Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility.

Lim Siong Guan. (2018). Can Singapore Fall: Making the Future of Singapore. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies.

Novidtri, I (2015). Analisis Korespondensi AKreditasi Sekolah Berdasarkan Status Sekolah dan Wilayah Provinsi [School Accreditation Correspondence Analysis Based on School Status and Province Region]. Bachelor degree. IPB University.

Ramadhan, A., Susetyo, B , Indahwati (2021). Classification Modelling of Random Forest to Identify the Important Factors in Improving the Quality of Education. International Journal Advanced Science engineering Information Technology, 11(2), 501-507.

Sallis, Eduard. (2011). Total Quality Management in Education. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Samsudin, M., Shodiq, S., Manan, N., Jannah, W., Wachidi, W., Rusdarti, R., & Dasuki, M. (2022). Developing Management and Leadership Training Innovation Program for Higher Education at Muhammadiyah Universities. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 4(1), 57-70. doi:https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v4i1.16544

Senge, Peter. (2012). School That Learn: A Fifth Discipline Resources. London: Nicholas Barely Publishing.

Setiawan, I.A. (2018). Penerapan Generalized Structured Component Analysis untuk Melihat Hubungan antara Hasil Akreditasi dan Ujian Nasional [Application of Generalized Structured Component Analysis to See the Relationship between Accreditation Results and National Examinations]. Master thesis. IPB University.

Setiawan, I.A., Susetyo, B, Fitrianto A. (2018). Application of Generalized Structural Component Analysis to Identify Relation between Accreditation and National Assessment. International Journal of Scientific Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 4(10), 93–97

Susetyo, B., Rezy,W (2021). Application of the fuzzy clusterwise generalized structured component method to evaluate implementation of national education standard in Indonesia. Management Science Letter, 11(4), 1379-1384.

Turkkahraman, M. 2015. Education, teaching and school as A social organization. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol 186 (2015) 381–387

Zampetakis LA. (2008). The role of creativity and proactivity on perceived entrepreneurial desirability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(3):154-162.

DOI: 10.23917/ijolae.v4i2.17113

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 553 time(s)
PDF: 424 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.