Cognitive flexibility: exploring students’ problem-solving in elementary school mathematics learning

Sri Rahayuningsih(1), Sirajuddin Sirajuddin(2*), Nasrun Nasrun(3)

(1) Department of Mathematics Education, STKIP YPUP Makassar
(2) Department of Primary School Teacher Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
(3) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author


In classroom learning, students need mathematical cognitive flexibility to be able to solve mathematical problems with the various ideas they express. To solve the problems, they must be able to grasp the problem, see it from various points of view, and should not be rigid thinking with one solving method.  In fact, the students still lack the ability to think flexibly in solving math problems. This exploration is necessary to determine how to encourage the students’ creative problem-solving. The purposive sampling technique is used to select two out of 150 of 4th Grade students who have taken an initial test to measure their creative abilities. Problem-solving worksheet, think-aloud records, and interviews are used as data collection instruments. Then, the data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach. The research instrument is validated by two professors of mathematics. Through a series of revisions based on expert advice, the validity results are said to be feasible for use. To check for reliability, field tests are tested on 10 students who meet the criteria as research subjects. Analysis results indicate that cognitive abilities involve cognitive processes in the form of the ability to assess process by looking for patterns of numbers, mentally compute, estimate, and assess the rationality or reasonableness of calculation results. Other findings on students' cognitive processes in solving math problems include looking for number patterns, carrying out trial-and-error (also called guess-and-check), and drawing diagrams. Students with cognitive flexibility tend to use trial-and-error when solving mathematical problems.


Cognitive flexibility, mathematical problem solving, fraction

Full Text:



Andayani, F., & Lathifah, A. N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Aritmatika Sosial. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 1–10.

Bishara, S. (2016). Creativity in unique problem-solving in mathematics and its influence on motivation for learning. Cogent Education, 3(1).

Brooks, S. K., Dunn, R., Amlôt, R., & Rubin, G. J. (2017). A systematic, thematic review of social and occupational factors associated with psychological outcomes in healthcare employees during an infectious disease outbreak. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(3), 248-257.

Campbell, Donald Thomas; Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed). California: SAGE Publications.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Early Childhood Mathematics Learning. 1, 461–55. Retreived from

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: The case of geometry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(2), 133–148.

Conway, P. F., & Sloane, F. C. (2005). International Trends in Post-Primary Mathematics Education : Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Assessment (Research Report). Retreived from

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th Edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Deliyianni, E., Gagatsis, A., Elia, I., & Panaoura, A. (2016). Representational Flexibility and Problem-Solving Ability in Fraction and Decimal Number Addition: A Structural Model. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14, 397–417.

Delyana, H. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Melalui Penerapan Pendekatan Open Ended. Lemma, 2(1), 26–34. Retreived from

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Gallagher, A. L., Murphy, C. A., Conway, P. F., & Perry, A. (2020). Establishing premises for inter-professional collaborative practice in school: inclusion, difference and influence. Disability and Rehabilitation, 0(0), 1–10.

Hadi, S. (2015). Number Sense : Berpikir Fleksibel. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 1–7. Retreived from

Hommel, B. (2015). Between Persistence and Flexibility: The Yin and Yang of Action Control. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 33–67.

Huang, R., Tlili, A., Chang, T. W., Zhang, X., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2020). Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1).

Huang, R., Yang, J., & Chang, T.-W. (2020). Handbook on Facilitating Flexible Learning During Educational Disruption: The Chinese Experience in Maintaining Undisrupted Learning in COVID-19 Outbreak. Beijing: Smart Learning Institute of Beijing Normal University

Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2020). Problem solving in mathematics education. In G. Gabriele Kaiser, Faculty of Education, University of Hamburg, Hamburg (Ed.), Research in Mathematics Education.

Ljung-Djärf, A., Brante, M. H. O., & Brante, E. W. (2013). Patterns of Variation: A Way to Support and Challenge Early Childhood Learning? Creative Education, 04(07), 33–42.

Mosimege, M. (2016). The Role and Importance of language in Ethnomathematical Research and Implications for Mathematics teaching and learning. 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education Hamburg, July, 24–31. Retreived from

Mursidik, E. M., Samsiyah, N., & Rudyanto, H. E. (2015). Creative Thinking Ability in Solving Open-Ended Mathematical Problems Viewed From the Level of Mathematics Ability of Elementary School Students. PEDAGOGIA: Journal of Education, 4(1), 23–33.

Nugroho, A. A., Nizaruddin, N., Dwijayanti, I., & Tristianti, A. (2020). Exploring students’ creative thinking in the use of representations in solving mathematical problems based on cognitive style. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(2), 202–217.

Özdin, S., & Bayrak Özdin, S. (2020). Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(5), 504–511.

Papic, M. (2007). Promoting Repeating Patterns with Young Children - More Than Just Alternating Colours! Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 12(3), 8–13.;dn=135529953955178;res=IELHSS

Pasnak, R., Schmerold, K. L., Robinson, M. F., Gadzichowski, K. M., Bock, A. M., O’Brien, S. E., Kidd, J. K., & Gallington, D. A. (2016). Understanding number sequences leads to understanding mathematics concepts. Journal of Educational Research, 109(6), 640–646.

Rahayuningsih. (2017). Persepsi keterampilan berpikir kreatif calon guru matematika di Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar dalam memecahkan masalah matematika geometri. Jurnal Integral Matematika dan Pembelajarannya, 5(1), 22–31.

Saleh, H., Untari, R. S., Susilo, J., Mu’alimin, & Sirajuddin. (2019). Student’s Deductive Reasoning: Playing Detective Role In an Online Game. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 3003–3007.

Santos-trigo, M., & Gooya, Z. (2015). Mathematical Problem Solving. In: Cho S. (eds) The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham.

Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2018). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72.

Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2015). Is problem posing a tool for identifying and developing mathematical creativity? Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice, December 2014, 141–174.

Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(1), 37–52.

Subaidi, A. (2016). Self-Efficacy Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal ∑igma. Universitas Madura, 1(2), 64–68. Retreived from

Subanji, S. (2016). Teori Berpikir Pseudo Penalaran Kovariasional. Malang: Penerbit Universitas Negeri Malang

Tan, D. A. (2018). Mathematical problem solving heuristics and solution strategies of senior high school students. International Journal of English and Education, 7(3), 1–17.

Thompson, D. F. (1993). Understanding Financial Conflicts of Interest. New England Journal of Medicine, 329(8), 573–576.

Van Der Linden, D., Sonnentag, S., Frese, M., & Van Dyck, C. (2001). Exploration strategies, performance, and error consequences when learning a complex computer task. Behaviour and Information Technology, 20(3), 189–198.

Warih, P. D., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII pada Materi Teorema Pythagoras. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya [KNPMP I], 377–384. Retreived from

Yang, X., Zhang, M., Kong, L., Wang, Q., & Hong, J. C. (2020). The Effects of Scientific Self-efficacy and Cognitive Anxiety on Science Engagement with the “Question-Observation-Doing-Explanation” Model during School Disruption in COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Zhu 2006.

Yeh, Y. C., Yen, C. F., Lai, C. S., Huang, C. H., Liu, K. M., & Huang, I. T. (2007). Correlations between academic achievement and anxiety and depression in medical students experiencing integrated curriculum reform. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 23(8), 379–386.

Yew, W. T.&Zamri, S. N. A. A. (2016). Problem Solving Strategies of Selected Pre-service Secondary School Mathematics Teachers in Malaysia. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2), 17–31. Retreived from

Zmigrod, L., Rentfrow, P. J., Zmigrod, S., & Robbins, T. W. (2019). Cognitive flexibility and religious disbelief. Psychological Research, 83(8), 1749–1759.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 973 time(s)
PDF: 481 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.