Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Penilaian

Putri Anggoro Kasih(1), Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo(2*)

(1) Program Studi PGSD, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
(2) Program Studi PGSD, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. DR. HAMKA
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah terdapat peningkatan hasil belajar matematika siswa melalui pembelajaran berbasis penilaian. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pre-eksperimental dengan desain pre-test dan post-test dalam satu kelompok. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 40 siswa kelas 5 di salah satu Sekolah Dasar di Kota Depok tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Pengumpulan data dilakukan menggunakan pre-test dan post-test. Kedua instrumen tersebut diujicoba terlebih dahulu sebelum diberikan pada partisipan. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan uji t dengan taraf signifikansi 5%. Temuan yang diperoleh dalam penelitian ini adalah terdapat peningkatan hasil belajar matematika siswa yang ditunjukkan dengan nilai t-hitung= 15,73 > 1,684 = t-kritis Penelitian ini mengisyaratkan bahwa penilaian dalam proses pembelajaran matematika tidak hanya digunakan sebagai bentuk pertanggungjawaban dalam proses belajar-mengajar, namun juga dapat dijadikan sarana untuk mendukung belajar-mengajar. Penelitian selanjutnya dapat mengeksplorasi lebih jauh beberapa strategi lain dalam ABL sehingga semakin memperkaya metode (dan alternatif) untuk diterapkan di kelas.

Keywords

pembelajaran berbasis penilaian, hasil belajar, pembelajaran matematika, sekolah dasar

Full Text:

PDF

References

Balan, A. (2010). Assessment for learning: A case study in mathematics education. (Doctoral thesis), Malmö University, Holmbergs, Malmö. Retrieved from www.mah.se/muep (Malmö Studies in Educational Sciences No. 68)

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, U.K.: Open university Press.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 9-21.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90. doi: 10.1177/003172171009200119

Brookhart, S. M. (2004). Assessment theory for college classrooms. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 100, 5-14.

Falchikov, N. (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In D. Boud & N. Falchikov (Eds.), Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term (pp. 128-143). London: Routledge.

Hargreaves, E. (2005). Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box. Cambridge Journal of Education, 35(2), 213-224.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Hristova, Z. (2014). Using Peers to Assess Oral Presentations to Foster Learning. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(3), 74-80.

Kim, M. (2009). The impact of an elaborated assessee’s role in peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(1), 105-114. doi: 10.1080/02602930801955960

Kusdiwelirawan, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2014). Mendesain penilaian untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran matematika di sekolah dasar. Paper presented at the Seminar Nasional Matematika, Jakarta.

Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics: Assessment for learning in practice. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.

Lianghuo, F., & Mei, Y. S. (2007). Integrating oral presentation into mathematics teaching and learning: An exploratory study with singapore secondary students. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, Monograph, 3, 81-98.

Ma, X., Millman, R., & Wells, M. (2008). Infusing assessment into mathematics content courses for pre-service elementary school teachers. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 7(3), 165-181. doi: 10.1007/s10671-008-9050-5

McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87, 40-49.

Miller, M. D., Linn, R. L., & Gronlund, N. E. (2012). Measurement and assessment in teaching: Pearson Higher Ed.

Purnomo, Y. W. (2014). Assessment-Based Learning: Sebuah Tinjauan untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar dan Pemahaman Matematis. Sigma, VI(1), 22-33.

Purnomo, Y. W. (2015). Pengembangan desain pembelajaran berbasis penilaian dalam pembelajaran matematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIV(2), 182-191.

Redhana, I. W. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran seminar socrates terhadap hasil belajar siswa. Cakrawala Pendidikan, XXXIII(1), 27-38.

Rowe, M. B. (1986). Wait time: slowing down may be a way of speeding up! Journal of teacher education, 37, 43-50. doi: 10.1177/002248718603700110

Rowe, M. B. (1987). Using wait time to stimulate inquiry. In W. W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 95-106). Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library.

Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional science, 18(2), 119-144.

Webb, N. L. (1992). Assessment of students’ knowledge of mathematics: Steps toward a theory. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 661-683). New York: MacMillan.

Wilen, W. W. (1987). Effective questions and questioning: A classroom application. In W. W. Wilen (Ed.), Questions, questioning techniques, and effective teaching (pp. 107-134). Washington, D. C.: National Education Association.

Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49-65. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000208994

Wolf, D., Bixby, J., Glenn III, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of research in education, 31-74. doi: 10.3102/0091732X017001031

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 2617 time(s)
PDF: 1799 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.