The Effect of Metacognitive Ability on Learning Outcomes of Geography Education Students

Faisal Arif Setiawan(1*), Deasy Arisanty(2), Karunia Puji Hastuti(3), Akhmad Munaya Rahman(4)

(1) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
(2) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
(3) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
(4) Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of metacognitive ability to improve the geography learning outcomes. This research is expo facto with a quantitative approach. Data was collected from 55 students from the geography education department. Data collection methods used in this study was questionnaires and documentation. The results showed that the metacognitive abilities of students had an average value of 44.57 or that metacognitive abilities were an insufficient category. There was a significant influence of metacognitive abilities on student learning outcomes as evidenced by t count = 6.508 > t table = 1.674. The contribution of the influence of metacognitive abilities on biogeography learning outcomes was equal to 0.444 or 44.4%, while the remainder of 66.6% was influenced by other factors.

Keywords

metacognitive abilities; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References

Corebima, A. D. (2006). Pembelajaran Biologi yang Memberdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Siswa. Paper presented in Pelatihan Strategi Metakognitif pada Pembelajaran Biologi untuk Guru-guru Biologi SMA, Lembaga Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPKM) UNPAR, Palangkaraya, 23 August 2006.

Danial, M. (2010). Kesadaran Metakognisi, Keterampilan Metakognisi dan Penguasaan Konsep Kimia Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Jilid 17, Nomor 3, October 2010. 225-229.

Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., and Kruger, J. (2003) Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 12, 3, 83-87.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.

Hopkins, D. (2011). Panduan guru: Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Kuntjojo. (2009). Kemampuan metakognitif dan Keberhasian Belajar Peserta Didik Accessed from: http://ebekunt.wordpress.com/2009/04/12/ kemampuanmetakognitif-dankeberhasilan belajar pesertadidik/.

Livingstone, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. Accessed from: http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/metacog.htm

Mulbar, U. (2008). Metakognisi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika. Available at: http//www. usmanmulbar. files. wordpress. com. Accessed on 7 July 2019.

Nugrahaningsih, T. K. (2012). Metakognisi Siswa SMA Kelas Akselerasi Dalam Memecahkan Soal Matematika, Magistra, Vol 24, No 84

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Landasan Psikologi Proses Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tibrani, M. M. (2017). Metacognitive Awarness of Biology Education Students in Human Physiology Lecture. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 1(1).

Woolfolk, A. (2010). Educational Psychology. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education International.

YCCD. (2005). Student Learning Outcomes. Retrieved from www.mt.liu.se/edu/Bologna/LO/slo.pdf.

DOI: 10.23917/ijolae.v2i2.9257

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 872 time(s)
PDF: 733 time(s)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.