The pattern of a relational understanding of fifth-grade students on integer operations

Dwi Priyo Utomo(1*)

(1) Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang
(*) Corresponding Author


Relational understanding constitutes students’ awareness of appropriate procedures to solve problems along with logical reasoning.  Itis pivotal to help students solve problems in mathematics. It is necessary that the teaching of mathematics be directed to achieve relational understanding. Accordingly, students are capable of solving complicated problems in mathematics. This current research aims at analyzing and describing relational understanding and the patterns of answering questions of the fifth graders on integer operation. This study used a qualitative approach with a case study as the research design. Further, three students belonging to the fifth grade of Elementary School in Malang City, Indonesia, were set up as the research subjects. A test was administered to measure the subjects' relational understanding. All collected data were analyzed using an interactive technique. The result has indicated that the highly-proficient student was able to show excellent relational understanding. Besides, it was shown that the fairly-proficient student could show good relational understanding. The lowly-proficient student was shown to be able to achieve only half of the holistic criteria set for relational understanding. The patterns of answering the questions demonstrated by all students in all levels included jotting down the models, completing the models, and answering the questions. The highly-proficient student understood the information and wrote it down. Whilst the fairly-proficient student understood the information without translating it into the written form. At last, the lowly-proficient student did not pronounce any signals of understanding of the information


Relational understanding, the pattern of answering questions, Integer operations

Full Text:



Anwar, R. B., Yuwono, I., & Rahman, A. (2016). Mathematical representation by students in building relational understanding on concepts of area and perimeter of rectangle. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(21). 2002-2008. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2016.2813.

Caron, L., & Jacques, P. (2001). Addition and subtraction. New York: Enslow Publisher, Inc.

Davis, E. J. (2006). A Model for Understanding in Mathematics. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(4), 1–13.

John A, V. de W., Jennifer M, B.-W., Louann H, L., & Karen S, K. (2014). Teaching Student-Centered Mathematics: Developmentally Appropriate Instruction for Grades 6-8 (Volume III) 3rd Edition. Boston: Pearson.

Minarni, A., Napitupulu, E. E., & Husein, R. (2016). Mathematical Understanding And Representation Ability Of Public Junior High School In North Sumatra. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 43–56.

Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., & Peterson, B. E. (2005). Mathematics for Elementary Teacher. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Napaphun, V. (2012). Relational Thinking : Learning Arithmetic in order to Promote Algebraic Thinking. Journal of Science and Mathematics, 35(2), 84–101.

Patkin, D., & Plaksin, O. (2018). Procedural And Relational Understanding Of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers Regarding Spatial Perception Of Angles In Pyramids. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–20.

Safitri, A. N., Juniati, D., & Masriyah. (2018). Students’ Relational Understanding in Quadrilateral Problem Solving Based on Adversity Quotient. Journal of Physics. 947(1). 1–6. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012039.

Seo, K.-H., & Ginsburg, H. P. (2003). The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77(1), 20–26.

Skemp, R. R. (2006). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Journal National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), 12(2), 88–95.

Star, J. R., & Stylianides, G. J. (2013). Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge: Exploring the Gap between Knowledge Type and Knowledge Quality. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 13(2), 169–181. DOI: 10.1080/14926156.2013.784828.

Stephens, M. (2006). Describing and Exploring the Power of Relational Thinking. Proceedings of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia Incorporated (pp. 479–486). Australia: University of Melbourne.

Todorova, A. D. (2016). Procedural and Conceptual Understanding in Undergraduate Linear Algebra. Proceedings of the First Conference of International Network for Didactic (pp 1-12). Montpellier (France): University Mathematics.

Van de Walle, J., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams. (2009). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics, Teaching Developmentally. USA: Pearson.

Walle, V. De, & John, A. (2008). Elementary and Middle School Mathematics: Teaching Developmentally, 6th edition. Pearson: Boston New York.

Weber, K. (2002). The Role Of Instrumental And Relational Understanding In Proofs About Group Isomorphism. In K. Weber (Ed.), Proceedings from the 2nd International Conference for the Teaching of Mathematics (pp. 1–9). New Jersey: The State University of New Jersey.

Yung, H. I., & Paas, F. (2015). Effects of computer-based visual representation on mathematics learning and cognitive load. Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 70–77.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 781 time(s)
PDF: 633 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.