Promoting creative thinking for gifted students in undergraduate mathematics

Parinya Sa Ngiamsunthorn(1*)

(1) Department of Mathematics, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi
(*) Corresponding Author


Gifted students need a form of special education through extracurricular and learning experiences because they have extraordinary potential in terms of intelligence, creativity, social and mentality, compared to other students. This study aims to investigate various teaching and learning approaches designed for gifted students, and to constitute appropriate techniques that enhance their creative thinking in mathematics. The participants of this study were first-year gifted students enrolled in fundamental mathematics courses towards their undergraduate engineering programs at a science and technology-based university in Thailand. This study discovered that an adequate use of challenge-based learning, problem solving process, project-based learning, well-designed questions and in-depth learning style in the classroom effectively fostered their insightful and creative thought. Moreover, an online tool such as Facebook could be used as a learning platform outside the classroom to engage them in online discussion and collaboration and to challenge their thinking. Ultimately, based on students’ feedbacks and evaluation, this study found that a combination of these techniques and methods built up a more comfortable and motivating atmosphere that helped them for creative thinking and corresponded to their needs and satisfaction.


Gifted students, creative thinking, mathematics, techniques and methods

Full Text:



Burney, V.(2008). Indiana mandate for high-ability identification and services signed by Governor Daniels: Record funding for high-ability students. , 31(1), 50. Gifted Child Today, 31(1), 50–51. Retrieved from

Clarke, L., & Bana, J. (2001). Phantom classmates: A case study of talented mathematics students learning via telematics. In & M. M. (Eds) In J. Bobis, B. Perry (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Retrieved from

Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (2002). Handbook of Gifted Education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Press.

Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2000). An enrichment philosophy and strategy for empowering young gifted children to become autonomous learners in science. Gifted and Talented International, 15(1), 16–18.

Diezmann, C. M., & Watters, J. J. (2002). The Importance of Challenging Tasks for Mathematically Gifted Students. Gifted and Talented International, 17(2), 76–84.

Fraser-Seeto, K., Howard, S. J., & Woodcock, S. (2013). Preparation for teaching gifted students: An updated investigation into university offerings in New South Wales. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 22(2), 45. Retrieved from

Gagné, F. (1985). Giftedness and Talent: Reexamining a Reexamination of the Definitions. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29(3), 103–112.

Gagné, Françoys, & Gagnier, N. (2004). The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26(3), 128–138.

Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. M. (2008). Teachers’ Negative Affect Toward Academically Gifted Students: An Evolutionary Psychological Study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217–231.

Khalil, M., & Accariya, Z. (2016). Identifying “Good” Teachers for Gifted Students. Creative Education, 7, 407–418.

Koshy, V. (2001). Teaching Mathematics to Able Children.London: David Fulton Publishers.

Landvogt, J. (2001). Affecting eternity: Teaching for talent development. Roeper Review, 23(4), 190–196.

Lassig, C. (2009). Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Gifted: The Importance of Professional Development and School Culture. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 18(2), 32–42. Retrieved from ;dn=985113224788269;res=IELHSS%3E ISSN: 1323-9686

Leikin, R. (2011). The education of mathematically gifted students: Some complexities and questions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1). Retrieved from

McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What Predicts Teachers’ Attitudes Toward the Gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(3), 246–254.

Milgram, R. M. (1979). Perception of teacher behavior in gifted and nongifted children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 125–128.

Nevo, B., & Rachmel, S. (2009). Education of Gifted Children: A General Roadmap and the Case of Israel. In Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (R. Leikin,). Retrieved from Oclusiyotyechudiyot/Mechunanim/Documents/gifted1.pdf

Plunkett, D. M., & Kronborg, D. L. (2011). Learning to Be a Teacher of the Gifted: The Importance of Examining Opinions and Challenging Misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International, 26(1–2), 31–46.

Plunkett, M. M. (2002). Impacting on Teacher Attitudes Toward Gifted Students.In W. Vialle, & J. Geake (Eds.). In Victoria (Ed.), The Gifted Enigma: A Collection of Articles (pp. 240–259). Retrieved from

Scott, P. (1998). Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: a Vygotskian Analysis and Review. Studies in Science Education, 32(1), 45–80.

Shaywitz, S. E., Holahan, J. M., Freudenheim, D. A., Fletcher, J. M., Makuch, R. W., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2001). Heterogeneity Within the Gifted: Higher IQ Boys Exhibit Behaviors Resembling Boys With Learning Disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(1), 16–23.

Taber, K. . (2008). Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science. Sci Ence and Education, 17(2–3), 179–218.

Taber, K. S. (2010). Challenging gifted learners: general principles for science educators; and exemplification in the context of teaching chemistry. Science Education International, 21(1), 5–30. Retrieved from //

Tjoe, H. (2015). Giftedness and Aesthetics: Perspectives of Expert Mathematicians and Mathematically Gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(3), 165–176.

Troxclair, D. A. (2013). Preservice teacher attitudes towards giftedness. Roeper Review, 35(1), 58–64.

Vidergor, H., & Reiter, prof. S. (2008). Satisfaction with School among Gifted Israeli Students Studying in Various Frameworks. Gifted and Talented International, 23(1), 29–50.

Ziv, Y., & Sorongon, A. (2011). Social Information Processing in Preschool Children: Relations to Sociodemographic Risk and Problem Behavior. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(4), 412–429.

Article Metrics

Abstract view(s): 1471 time(s)
PDF: 957 time(s)


  • There are currently no refbacks.